User:Carino, Cz/Virtual pitch/A. Lee Crawford Peer Review

General info
Carino, Cz
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Missing fundamental
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Missing fundamental

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I enjoyed reading the article. It's a complicated subject to tackle for sure!


 * 1) Parsing the spectral envelope was a great source to reference. However, the link to the PDF doesn't work. Maybe try linking it some other way and putting it in the reference section instead.
 * 2) Instead of linking the article and mentioning the author directly in your article additions, it would probably be better to cite the sources and just put them in references. This is the format that i generally see Wikipedia writers using.
 * 3) I love what you said about Ian's article! The source is very in depth to say the least. I think you could go even more in depth with certain subjects found in the article, and that would also add some bulk to that particular paragraph.