User:Carlematsu/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Mililani Mauka, Hawaii


 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead Section
 * - There is a lead section. It is concise and includes introductory information that is in the article
 * Content
 * - Content is sparse.
 * - There is content missing and there could be more information added
 * - It is not up to date
 * - Focused mainly on geography and less about the history and demographics
 * Tone and balance
 * - The article is neutral. There is no bias.
 * Organization and writing quality
 * - Concise and clear. no spelling errors
 * - There are not enough section for the topic. Should be more important information in the subheadings
 * Sourcing
 * - Sources are reliable and neutral
 * - They are not necessarily up to date
 * - They are not written from "diverse" points of view
 * - There are better sources available
 * Images and Media
 * - Include images that contribute to the article
 * - Image well captioned
 * - There are only two images. It is laid out in a pleasing way
 * Overall Impressions
 * - This is a reliable article. The sources are neutral and the language is informative but I could add a lot to it to make it better
 * - I could add information about the demographic in Mililani, its history, the decision to build upon the land, the governance there, etc.
 * - There is also information missing that I could fill out
 * Talk section
 * - There is not activity on the Talk section
 * - It is currently part of WikiProjects Hawaii that helps improve coverage on information about Hawaii
 * - The article is rated as having low importance
 * Sources
 * https://www.ksbe.edu/assets/site/special_section/regions/ewa/Halau_o_Puuloa_Waipio.pdf
 * https://www.ksbe.edu/assets/site/special_section/regions/ewa/Halau_o_Puuloa_Waipio.pdf

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Aloha 'Āina Party


 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead Section
 * - There is a lead section. It is really short and does not summarize all the key points in the article
 * Content
 * - Content is sparse.
 * - There is content missing and there could be more information added
 * - It is not up to date
 * - Focused mainly on the history and the members
 * Tone and balance
 * - The article is neutral
 * - But some of the information could be viewed as incorrect
 * Organization and writing quality
 * - Concise and clear. no spelling errors
 * - There are not enough sections on the topic. Should be more important information and sections about the party
 * Sourcing
 * - Sources are reliable and neutral
 * - They are relatively up to date
 * - They are not written from "diverse" points of view
 * Images and Media
 * - includes images of their party logo
 * - There could be more images
 * Overall Impressions
 * - This article needs more information about the party, the people, their impact, their opponents, etc.
 * - Sources are decent but mainly come from news articles
 * - Could have more diverse points of view
 * Talk section
 * - The only activity in the talk section is a user critiquing how the writer classifies the party. They make good points about the way they list their candidates
 * - WikiProjects Hawaii is currently interested in this article
 * - The article is was nominated for deletion
 * Sources
 * https://www.civilbeat.org/2020/09/aloha-aina-party-hopes-to-gain-ground-with-nontraditional-voters/
 * https://www.civilbeat.org/2020/09/aloha-aina-party-hopes-to-gain-ground-with-nontraditional-voters/

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Information Control Division


 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead Section
 * - There is a lead section. It is good at briefly explaining the topic, but there are no other subheading or any other information on the page except for the lead section
 * - There is no other information in the article to weigh the lead section against
 * Content
 * - There is no content in the article except for the lead section
 * - There are no subheadings or any other pieces of information about the Information Control Division
 * - In the lead section itself, there is a good summary of the purpose of the Information Control Division
 * - The context itself is reduced to the lead section
 * Tone and balance
 * - The article is neutral but there is only the lead section to judge.
 * - There are no minority or fringe viewpoints discussed because the article is so short
 * Organization and writing quality
 * - Concise and clear. no spelling errors
 * - There is not enough information for the topic, but for the lead section is has, the writing quality is good
 * - There is no organization because there is only a lead section
 * Sourcing
 * - There is only two sources that could be legitimate. They are books about the Information Control Division
 * - The other source no longer works
 * - There are only about three sources because there is so little information
 * Images and Media
 * - No media or images at all
 * Overall Impressions
 * - This article has almost no information on it when there could be a lot more
 * - Needs information sections like: History, Important figures, Impact, Media forms, tc
 * - Needs better and more reliable sources
 * - Needs more content in general
 * Talk section
 * - There is not activity on the Talk section
 * - It is currently part of the Military History WikiProjects page
 * - The article is rated as having low importance
 * - It is rated as part of the start class of wikiprojects
 * - It is rated as part of the start class of wikiprojects


 * Sources
 * https://history.army.mil/books/wwii/occ-gy/ch20.htm

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Green Panthers


 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Liberalism in the United States
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources