User:Carlematsu/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Information Control Division

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I am very interested in World War II related history, especially post-war measures that were taken against the Germans. I did not know this division existed before I came across this article and I would like to expand it. My first impression was that it could easily have more information on it. There is only a lead section and it had no subheadings. I found this article to be a good starter article for wikipedia editing.

Evaluate the article

 * Article title
 * Information Control Division


 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead Section
 * - There is a lead section. It is good at briefly explaining the topic, but there are no other subheading or any other information on the page except for the lead section
 * - There is no other information in the article to weigh the lead section against
 * Content
 * - There is no content in the article except for the lead section
 * - There are no subheadings or any other pieces of information about the Information Control Division
 * - In the lead section itself, there is a good summary of the purpose of the Information Control Division
 * - The context itself is reduced to the lead section
 * Tone and balance
 * - The article is neutral but there is only the lead section to judge.
 * - There are no minority or fringe viewpoints discussed because the article is so short
 * Organization and writing quality
 * - Concise and clear. no spelling errors
 * - There is not enough information for the topic, but for the lead section it has, the writing quality is good
 * - There is no organization because there is only a lead section. There are no individual sections.
 * Sourcing
 * - There is only two sources that could be legitimate. They are books about the Information Control Division
 * - The other source no longer works
 * - There are only about three sources because there is so little information
 * Images and Media
 * - No media or images at all
 * Overall Impressions
 * - This article has almost no information on it when there could be a lot more
 * - Needs information sections like: History, Important figures, Impact, Media forms, tc
 * - Needs better and more reliable sources
 * - Needs more content in general
 * - It would be useful to have pictures
 * - There should be more sections and subheadings to explain the topic
 * Talk section
 * - There is not activity on the Talk section
 * - It is currently part of the Military History WikiProjects page
 * - The article is rated as having low importance
 * - It is rated as part of the start class of wikiprojects
 * - It is rated as part of the start class of wikiprojects