User:Carolidou/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludoth%C3%A8que
 * L'article est un brouillon principalement basée sur le ludothèque française. Au Québec, on parle plus de joujouthèque. Il serait intéressant d'approfondir le sujet.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Pas tout à fait
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? L'article n'est pas développé, il manque des sections de contenu.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Non
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? L'article n'est pas développé

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? oui
 * Is the content up-to-date? Non
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Il y a beaucoup d'éléments manquants.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Non

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Oui
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Non
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Non
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Non

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Le contenu n'est pas suffisamment référencé
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Seulement 3 références de sources fiables.
 * Are the sources current? Oui
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Les sources ne sont pas assez nombreuses
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Un page liée n'existe plus. Les autres liens fonctionnent.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Il est clair et concis mais mal écrit.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? Non
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Il n'y a pas de sections, il n'est pas bien divisé.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Oui
 * Are images well-captioned? Oui
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Provient de la biblio de San Jose. Je ne suis pas sure qu'elle soit pertinente pour l'article.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Oui

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Aucune discussion
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? C'est une ébauche, son importance est faible, il a été indexé par le projet "Jeu video"
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Ébauche
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved? Le contenu et les sources
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? sous-développé

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_utilisateur:Carolidou