User:CarolinaStudent/Nature-based solutions/Shendralar Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

CarolinaStudent


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CarolinaStudent/Nature-based_solutions?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Nature-based solutions

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The draft created is rich with details and does a good job of explaining the information while abiding to key Wikipedia guidelines. A couple of instances exist of inconsistent citation such as citations within a sentence and not all the end. I am uncertain if "BiodivERsA." is spelt correctly. Furthermore the Section pertaining to the EU, and Paris Agreement are lacking citations. I appreciated the table created as it helps me better understand the content. Overall, the draft created by CarolinaStudent is content rich and presents the information well. Citations are lacking in some instances but that comes with the drafting process. The revisions and additions make the page more complete and comprehensive.