User:Caroline.Alexandre59/Guanosine diphosphate/Jessicamarutani Peer Review

General info
Caroline.Alexandre59
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Caroline.Alexandre59/Guanosine_diphosphate?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Guanosine diphosphate

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

The lead has been updated to reflect the new content added by my peer. It is concise yet clear, it introduces the topic of the GDP signaling and how it can be relevant to the information my peer has added.

Content:

The content is relevant and up to date. All the content provided in their insert is comprehendible and easy to understand. My peer opened by stating what type of signaling they were describing and also included a short summary sentence on alpha and beta importins which was informative and gave good background information.

Tone and Balance:

The content was neutral and does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position. Their viewpoint is neither over or underrepresented and strictly keeps to scientific facts and information.

Sources and References:

The references used are relevant to the topics being discussed. The content is reliable and are all peer reviewed articles. The content accurately reflects what the cited sources say, however does not plagiarize any information. The sources are somewhat current as they were both written in the 2000s.

Organization:

The content is well written and organized. There was concise and clear intent on the topic of intracellular signaling. The use of RanGTPase with the given importins and other factors were relevant to the topic and the pathway described was understandable from their insert. Since the topic was on GDP, the use of also describing and including how it became hydrolyzed was relevant to the page.

Images and Media

No images were added.

Overall Impressions:

Overall this insert was very well written and only included relevant information to Guanosine diphosphate. The information provided was concise and clear. The writer used proper and reliable citations which is beneficial for current readers. The lead sentence briefly summarized what the article body covered and how it was relevant to the current GDP page. Overall, excellent addition to the GDP article.