User:Carolinefortune/sandbox

Article Evaluation:

Evaluating content: The "Fouling Communities" article that I will be adding to is currently very concise and lacks a lot of information.There are a few short paragraphs under each of the topic headings, some could use more information. There is also no pictures illustrating the many examples of fouling communities listed, so I will be sure to add some. There is very short and choppy syntax, so I will fix that as well. The definition is mostly just examples, and can definitely be elongated and more detailed. It is never explained why these organisms live on artificial environments.

Evaluating tone: Although having an unbiased tone, the diction used is very academic and can be hard for some to understand, and there is a lot of science jargon. Explaining further what some of the 'science-y' words mean to readers may help people using the wikipedia page as a source better understand fouling communities.

Evaluating sources: All sources are cited correctly and seem to be credible, there are however a few links that seem outdated as they do not go to an article but a website. One of the main sources cited was a book published in 1983, which could be considered outdated.

Evaluating talk page: There is only one message on the talk page from another student who edited the page back in 2017. The talk page shows the main/only editors of the page have been students.