User:Carolinehardingggggg/Morrison–Grady Plan/Angeearnold Peer Review

I feel that some of the exact language and grammar used could be adjusted. For example, there should be commas for the dates in the first paragraph. Additionally, more information regarding how the plan was presented would be helpful to future readers. Perhaps include any biases that each person may have had. Your citations need a second look also, there's an error marked. Although these recommendations would help make this article stronger, I feel that your group is off to a very strong start and I look forward to the final project. Overall, I feel that you present the information in a neutral and natural way.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)