User:Caroliner6/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
I am evaluating the Raya (app) article.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have chosen this article to evaluate because of its overall brevity and room for expansion. Due to the prevalence of use and variety of dating apps available, it is important to provide a comprehensive review of this app. The page could offer new users insights, inform the general public of the company's history and potential impact, and contribute to a larger discourse of social and dating apps. My preliminary impression of the article was that it offered a very quick introduction into the company, but seemed to be lacking in its current content.

Evaluate the article

 * The article includes a concise description of the articles topic. However, the lead does not include a brief description of the article’s major sections.
 * All of the content sections only have a few sentences. While there is not content that does not belong, there does seem to be content missing.
 * The article maintains a neutral point of view and does not attempt to say the reader in favor of one position.
 * Aside from one yellow source, the sources are deemed reliable according to the Wikipedia source page. All the sources have been published within the past ten years, and all the links work. All the citations listed are from online news sources, so there may be additional sources to include from other formats as well.
 * Overall, the article is well written and does not have any grammatical or spelling errors. The article does not include an images, but due to the nature of the topic there may not be substantial media to incorporate into the article.
 * The article is categorized as a part of the WikiProject Apps, and currently has a rating of Stub-Class.
 * The article can be improved by added additional sections and including additional sources.