User:Caroruguita/Animal sanctuary/Rbatista18 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

* Evaluation Scale: Poor, Good, Excellent

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) - User: Caroruguita
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Caroruguita/Animal sanctuary
 * Link to article: Animal sanctuary

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - My peer has yet to include content.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? - Yes.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? - No.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? - No.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? - Very concise. The lead presents a quick overview of the topic.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? - Yes.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? - Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? - The article has substantial room for more details and examples.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? - Some phrases are subjective.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? - No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? - An opposing viewpoint to animal sanctuaries is not represented.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? - No.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - No.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? - The number of sources reflects the article's length.
 * Are the sources current? - Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? - Yes.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? - Yes.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? - No.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? - Yes.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? - Yes.
 * Are images well-captioned? - Yes.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? - Yes.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? - Yes.