User:Carrotplushie/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Article title

 * The Promised Neverland

Lead Section

 * The first sentence of the Lead Section should include the author and the genre.
 * The Lead section should be revised, as it focuses too much on the production and has no information about the rest of the main sections of the article.

Content

 * Expand more on the "Plot" section of the article because it's a bit too short and not as detailed as the rest of the major sections.
 * Update the article's anime subsection, as the newest season (season 2) was just released.

Tone and Balance

 * Article is neutral and doesn't sound biased.

Sources and References

 * The links that I checked worked (I checked about 15 of them).
 * Sources could be better - a lot of them are from the same website and are based on reviews.
 * I would suggest adding more reputable/scholarly sources from different journals, scholarly websites, etc.

Organization and Writing Quality

 * Sounds a bit "review-ish"
 * Could sound more clear and concise by using better vocabulary and some more information.
 * Overall organization of the main sections could be fixed around so that the article flows smoothly.
 * No grammar or spelling errors.

Images and Media

 * Has only 1 image as of right now - but that image is captioned correctly and cites the source (which I think follows Wikipedia's copyright regulations).
 * I would advise to add some more pictures - especially in the sections where it's introducing the author and the main characters of the anime/manga, so that the readers can get a visual of what these people look like.

Talk Page Discussion:

 * Only has one comment from April 2020, talking about how the publication date listed in the article is wrong.
 * The article is a part of the "WikiProject Anime and manga"
 * Is rated as a "start class" article on the quality scale
 * Also rated as an article of "low importance" on the importance scale.

Overall Impression

 * The articles overall status is incomplete/lacking some information.
 * It's strength is that it already includes a little bit of information regarding the major sections.
 * I think this article can be improved by fixing the Lead Section, organizing the structure of the sections/subsections, adding more images, getting better sources, and adding some more information here and there.

Article title

 * Yona of the Dawn

Lead Section

 * The first sentence clearly and concisely introduces the topic at hand - but I would just add in the genre.
 * The lead doesn't include any information regarding the major/main sections - so I would add that in.
 * The lead only speaks on the production of the manga/anime - so I would add in the other main categories that the article lays out.
 * The lead section is very short and mot overly detailed as it is missing some information - expand some more.

Content

 * The content is relevant to the topic of the article
 * The content is up-to-date.
 * Missing information about the manga and the anime.

Tone and Balance

 * The article is written with a neutral tone and doesn't sound biased.

Sources and References

 * Lacking in the amount of sources it has to convey the article's information better (only has 11 sources).
 * Majority of those 11 sources come from the same website - so I would advise to get more sources from different websites, journals, etc.
 * The links work.

Organization and Writing Quality

 * Organized really well and flows together smoothly.
 * No grammar or spelling errors.
 * I would tweak the writing to make it more clear and easy to read though.

Images and Media:

 * Has only 1 image as of right now - but that image is captioned correctly and cites the source (which I think follows Wikipedia's copyright regulations).
 * I would advise to add some more pictures - especially in the sections where it's introducing the author and the main characters of the anime/manga, so that the readers can get a visual of what these people look like.

Talk Page Discussion

 * Only has two comments regarding the character names listed in the article and a supposed copyright violation (since there's quite a bit of information and not a lot of sources to back the information up).
 * The article is a part of the "WikiProject Anime and manga"
 * Is rated as a "start class" article on the quality scale
 * Also rated as an article of "low importance" on the importance scale.

Overall Impression

 * Article is incomplete and lacking MANY sources to back up their information.
 * It's strengths are that it's organized well and has the main categories listed.
 * I think this article can be improved by fixing the Lead Section, adding more images, getting way more references from better sources, and adding some more information here and there.

Article Title
Princess Mononoke

Lead Section

 * The lead section is well-written and includes all the main aspects of the article.

Content

 * Content is relevant to the topic and is up-to-date.

Tone and Balance

 * Article is neutral and doesn't sound biased.

Sources and References

 * The links that I checked worked (I checked around 10 of them).
 * Sources are good and come from different places.

Organization and Writing Quality

 * Sounds scholarly - very easy to read.
 * Overall organization of the main sections could be fixed around so that the article flows smoothly.
 * No grammar or spelling errors.

Images and Media

 * Has 3 images that are captioned and cited correctly (which I think follows Wikipedia's copyright regulations).
 * I would advise to add some more pictures - especially in the sections where it's introducing the author and the main characters of the film, so that the readers can get a visual of what these people look like.

Talk Page Discussion:

 * Has lots of comments from users who have modified the article over the years.
 * Was nominated as a "Media and drama good article" but didn't meet the criteria of a good article.
 * Listed as a "Level-5 vital article in Arts"
 * Rated as a "C-Class" article.
 * The article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: WikiProject Film/Animated/Japanese, WikiProject Animation/Films, and WikiProject Anime and manga/Studio Ghibli.

Overall Impression

 * The articles overall status is really good, but it needs to be formatted/organized better so that it's easier to read.
 * It's strength is that it already includes lots of information regarding the major sections.
 * I think this article can be improved by organizing the structure of the sections/subsections, adding more images, and getting more sources.