User:Carson22jones/OpTic Gaming/Amos is Ward Peer Review

General info
Carson22jones
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Carson22jones/OpTic Gaming - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * OpTic Gaming - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

Lead of the article is currently unchanged, based on the changes so far it does not need to be.

Content

The content added is up to date and relevant to the topic.

Tone and Balance

The content added is a neutral, statement of fact, backed by records, with no apparent bias.

Sources and References

The currently added content is sourced. The Bibliography contains many useful secondary sources which will back the content well once citations are added into the article, although they currently are not.

Organization

The new additions are concise, to the point and well written. They are also organized appropriately in the article.

Images and Media

The newly added table displays information efficiently and fits well with the rest of the tables in the article.

Overall Impressions

Overall, the added and updated content is informative and well organized so far. As you continue working on your additions, you might add text to give context to the changes in the roster tables, as well as the new tables. All in all, your additions look good so far, keep up the good work, and I'll try to check back on your article later to update my review and give you feedback to help improve your work.