User:CarsonJones06/Environmental Communication/Dingers99 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

CarsonJones06


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:CarsonJones06/Environmental Communication
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Environmental communication
 * Environmental communication

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

It doesn't look like you've added anything to the lead paragraph so far. I think this is okay. The paragraph as it is seems to adaquetly describe what environmental communication is. Adding some sources may be beneficial. For example, the last sentence definitely needs a source. Maybe try to find a source explaining Alexander Flor and his theory explaining environmental communication.

Content:

The things you are going to add are great. They certainly contribute to the overall article and as a reader, these changes and additions help me understand more of what environmental communication is. You have a lot of sources which is great. I would consider adding a source to the very last sentence you want to add about sustainability science and cooperation between stakeholders.

Tone and Balance:

All the content you want to add is neutral and contributes to the overall topic. You have sources for pretty much everything you want to add which contributes to the neutrality of the overall article. There are no viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented. The content does not attempt to pursuade the reader to believe something in particular. It is merely describing what environmental communication is, it's history, and the current state of the discipline.

Sources and References:

Your sources are great. I clicked on a couple and they all worked. They took me right to the article. These were all very interesting sources that helped me better understand environmental communication. For example, I was able to learn more about some of the sub-disciplines within environmental communication.

Organization:

The organization is great. The content you want to add is well written and consice. Each sentence is simple but adaquetly explains the points you are trying to make.

Images and Media:

It doesn't look like you have any images or media that you are adding. The image at the top of actual page seems to fit the context of the article.

Overall Impressions:

Overall this is very well written. There are definitely imporvements that need to be made in the actual article and you seem to have figured out where those changes need to be made and found a source to add to what's missing. The only thing I would say is that you can never have enough sources. The lead paragraph definitely needs a source for the last sentence and there are a couple other places you could add sources throughout the body of the article.