User:Carterlockwood1/Political communication/Megan.Fournier Peer Review

General info
Carterlockwood1
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Carterlockwood1/Political communication
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Political communication

Evaluate the drafted changes
Very very ambitious, which is good! I think it might help to just narrow down all that you plan to do. Changing things too much might make the other editors upset and put too much on your plate. I think it is fine to just focus on one of the three things you said, history, technology, and persuasion. Or just focus on those three and not the rest. I think it is important to really focus and build a great part for a smaller number than spreading yourself out of much and risking quality. Of coursed if you think you can do it well and feel up for it, go for it! It all looks very interesting and cool so I’m sure whatever you do it’ll be great.