User:Cassidybohne/Raunch aesthetics/Vaidajj Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Cassidybohne


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Cassidybohne/Raunch aesthetics
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Raunch aesthetics

Evaluate the drafted changes
The draft had a URL to an article on Harper's Bazaar website, about Amber Rose's views on Slut Shaming. This article was used to add information in the article body, yet it wasn't cited or added as a reference in the article or the bibliography. Also, I think according to the wiki trainings this would not be viewed as a credible and reliable source on wikipedia because it does not come from an academic peer reviewed source. So although Amber Rose may be an important voice to utilize in the Raunch Aesthetics page, the magazine website may not be the best to use. I'm not sure what else was added to the article because it wasn't specified in the draft what portion information was added to and what the source was- I just assumed the Amber Rose stuff was added because of the URL, but if it was added it should be cited in the references. I don't think the the lead was updated, but if the Amber Rose stuff was added then I think it was useful to the article to provide a perspective someone who participates in Raunch Aesthetics. The content was easy to read, and I appreciated the images- just needs more organization.