User:CassieClovis02/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because in high school I was involved in an organization called Future Farmers of America (FFA) where I competed in a Career Development Event called Agricultural Issues. The topic that my team and I chose for this competition was Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae. We did research on this project for months and completed on-site testing for this disease in bighorn sheep. The current article looks informative, but I believe there is much more information that could be added to improve it. I will be using many different scholarly sources as well as my own data that I was able to collect while conducing on-site research relating to the disease in bighorn sheep in Hells Canyon, Idaho.

Evaluate the article
The lead section of this article is good. It is concise and gets to the point of the definition quickly. The content of the article is sufficient as well, but could use more material to broaden the scope of understanding on the topic of Mycoplasma ovipneumonia. The article's content is very relevant to the topic and this article does not deal with any equity gaps. The article is neutral and unbiased, and does not try to persuade the reader one way or another on the topic. The facts in this article are supported by scholarly reliable sources. Although these sources are a few years old, they are relatively up to date. The links to these sources do work, and the articles are diverse in terms of authors and time periods in which they are published. There are some better sources available, such as some newer sources from recent research done on this topic. The article is easy to read, concise, and knowledgeable. It is organized well for the small amount of content the article provides. There are no images provided with this article to help the readers better understand the topic at hand. This article is a stub page and there are limited talk page interactions on this article. There are seven in total starting in 2007 and the most current edit being made in April of 2021. Overall, this article has good information but can be improved by adding more current and relevant information as well as images. The article's strengths are that it gives readers a good base-level understanding of the disease and how it impacts a certain population, as well as providing a good list of sources to refer to for more information and fact checking purposes. I would say that this article is underdeveloped and could use more information to better it overall.