User:Cassiepark/Allergy to Cats/Ortiz56 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * I am peer reviewing Cassie Parks group article on allergies to cats
 * Allergy to cats

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Everything look like its been up to date on this article but maybe some of the references need to be updated to some of today's recent studies
 * They could have introduced the topic a little better with a better opener but over all it was a good introduction
 * In the introduction it just briefly breaks down the allergies and the different types giving us some overview of whats to come
 * The lead has good information but some does need citations in where they have got that information that allow them to put it together
 * The lead is straight to the point and easy to digest of the break down regarding the allergen to the cats

Content
Guiding questions:


 * The content is relevant and gives a good description on the allergen that cats produced
 * The article uses a lot of old information but maybe they can use more up to date research
 * They could have added pictures of the different cats they describe that are hypoallergenic

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * The content seems to be pretty neutral but there are parts where they should add citations to see how they came up with that type of info
 * Everything seems to be pretty content and straight to the point
 * The other allergens that they presented on their article such as Fed 2, Fed 1, Fed 3, and Cat Ig A could have been explain better or give a brief overview of how they relate to cat allergen
 * The content does not persuade the reader in any form to not like cats because of this information

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * The sources seems to be reliable and very informative
 * There sources follow through with the information they have provided on this article
 * The information are from old research and it seems they didn't find any current research
 * The links works and take you to specific information they have highlighted

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * The content is easy to follow but there was parts where I had to re-read again to understand or look up some words to understand what they meant
 * Everything seem to be proof read and grammar seem to be good
 * The article seem to be well put and broken down. There is some sections where it can use little more information such as the Synthetic epitpoe vaccine, other alternatives of over the counter medication, and maybe ways to help improve ones health againt these allergies

Images and Media
There is no pictures in this article

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * The article does meet the Wiki-pedia standard
 * The article has a good amount of sources where they had got their information even though in some sections it does need more citations
 * The article has certain sections where it break it down and is in Bold and Unlined to show the reader what will be explained
 * the article do link to the other article in order to follow or understand the information better

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * The article seems to be complete but might need more citations but over all its a easy to follow article
 * The strengths of the article is how they broke down the sections from the allergens to the medications and even about how bathing your cat helps with these allergen
 * I believe the article is good and an easy read. Perhaps have a better opener in the introduction, include more citations, provide more information on the allergens, and also ways to improve ones health when it comes to these allergens