User:Cassiopeia/CVUA/C1K98V

Hello, welcome to your Counter Vandalism Unit Academy page! Every person I instruct will have their own page on which I will give them support and tasks for them to complete. Please make sure you have this page added to your watchlist. Your academy page has been specifically designed according to you and what you have requested instruction in - for that reason, please be as specific as possible when under my instruction, so that I know the best ways to help you (and do not be afraid to let me know if you think something isn't working). If you have any general queries about anti-vandalism (or anything else), you are more than welcome to raise them with me at User talk:Cassiopeia/CVUA/C1K98V.

Make sure you read through Vandalism as that's the knowledge which most of the questions I ask you and tasks you do will revolve around.

This page will be built up over your time in the Academy, with new sections being added as you complete old ones. Each section will end with a task, written in bold type - this might just ask a question, or it might require you to go and do something. You can answer a question by typing the answer below the task; if you have to do something, you will need to provide diffs to demonstrate that you have completed the task. Some sections will have more than one task, sometimes additional tasks may be added to a section as you complete them. Please always sign your responses to tasks as you would on a talk page.
 * How to use this page
 * Once you graduate I will copy this page into your userspace so you have a record of your training and a reference for the future.

Twinkle Twinkle is a very useful tool when performing maintenance functions around Wikipedia. Please have a read through WP:TWINKLE.
 * Enable Twinkle (if haven't already) and leave a note here to let me know that you have enabled it.

Yes I have enabled twinkle from the preference. I will read thoroughly. Thanks

Good faith and vandalism
When patrolling for vandalism, you may often come across edits which are unhelpful, but not vandalism - these are good faith edits. It is important to recognise the difference between a vandalism edit and a good faith edit, especially because Twinkle gives you the option of labelling edits you revert as such. Please read WP:AGF and WP:NOT VANDALISM before completing the following tasks.

Answer:
 * Please explain below the difference between a good faith edit and a vandalism edit, and how you would tell them apart.

A good faith edits are those where Intentions are clear to contribute to wikipedia projet. but it can be lack of understanding of policy, inexperience (newbies) or kind of mistakes where edits are turned out to be unhelpful/unnecessary.

Vandalism are those edits where the nature of edit are meant to harm the wikipedia project. And the editor/IP has bad intentions so they make edits which are non-constructive, contain promotion either blank the article, or include wrong info without proper source.
 * Pls answer part 2 question. Cassiopeia(talk) 12:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

I would simply check the article diff and history and revert it back to the neutral point of view if possible in good faith. And would leave a note to the editor who tried to vandalize the page. And if I can't normalize the vandalism then I would ask help from IRC.
 * ✅ To check the editor history log and talk page to see their editing pattern if their edit is in question (could be good faith but dont know the Wikipedia guidelines) is a good approach. However, the key here is "intention". If an editor intends to help Wikipedia, and the edit is considered disruptive, they are still considered a "good faith" editor especially the new editor does not aware their edits are disruptive. Vandalism is a "deliberate attempt" to harm Wikipedia. Editor might edit adds incorrect or unsourced information and this does not necessarily mean a user is a vandal; the key is their "intention". Cassiopeia(talk) 04:45, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Answer:
 * Please find three examples of good faith but unhelpful edits, and three examples of vandalism. You don't need to revert the example you find, and I am happy for you to use previous undos in your edit history if you wish.
 * Good faith

(1) 	- Fixed wiki link
 * ✅. Cassiopeia(talk) 12:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

(2) - seems to be neutral
 * ✅. Cassiopeia(talk) 12:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

(3) - wikilink which seems to be unnecessary
 * ✅.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 12:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Answer:

(1) - death reporting info, but unsourced.
 * unsourced content is not a vandalism edit; however, his death is classified a suicide is debatable. However, they are plenty of reliable source reported his his death. In short, in cases of such, we also check if any source in the internet has reported such indictment and if the subject is only popular in certain country (say a Cambodian local actor) which which the news might not reach the English media, then leave the edit alone for someone who is more familiar with the subject to due with the edit.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 13:49, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

(2) - removing content from article . The editor indicated "duplicated info" on the edit summary - I think the editor might not aware that the WP:LEAD section is the summary of the body text which the info could be seen twice (duplicated) in lead section and the body text. In this sense the editor might not "intentionally" made a vandalism edit.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 13:49, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

(3), - intentionally adding and removing info
 * Editor added sourced content which is similar to that of they deleted.13:49, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

(4) - pure vandal, blanking content from article
 * ✅ I think you meant  this hist diff  by the IP editor.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 11:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

(5) - adding personal views which is vandal
 * ✅.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 11:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

(6) - trying to make changes in particular words seems irrelevant.
 * ✅.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 11:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

-

Good day. Any question regrading the assignment, please let me know here. For other questions not relating to the assignments, ping me on the talk page of this subpage  Here. See above the first assignment. Pls provide "all" hist diffs (revert diff, report diff, deletion diff, talk page diff and etc.) on your assignment Welcome to CVUA. Ping me here when you are done and ready for review. Stay safe and best.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 09:33, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Have you finished with your assignment above as you have answered all the questions but you didnt ping me. Pls advise. Thank you.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 12:15, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello yes I have finished the task by you. And I pinged you on your talk page. Sorry I will ping you here from now onwards. You can review my answer. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 12:18, 9 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi, Pls provide the hist diff in non mobile format. I need THIS Format and NOT this format for 3 answer of "Vandalism" above and all hist diffs for here on. Once you have done them, pls ping me. thank you.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 12:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello I have changed it THIS Format as you wanted. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂)


 * Pls see above review. Kindly read WP:V and answer 3 additional Vandalism questions (4,5 and 6) above. Let me know if you have any questions. Ping me when it is done. Thank you.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 13:49, 10 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello in my opinion question 4 is correct, so I would like to request you to consider the answer. Check this Report, his suicide is debatable topic but their were sources available. But the IP editor does spread vandalism by updating the page without reliable source the sources were available too. And these lead to the several controversial check this, , . Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 15:08, 10 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello yes I have gone through WP:V and also find some examples for vandalism. You can now review it. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 16:32, 10 July 2020 (UTC)


 * See review and I suggest you to look into the examples where by the editors were/are blocked to understand the vandalism edits better - see here where the editors' names cross out. Do note disruptive edits are usually not a vandalism edits but if the editors continues to in the same disruptive edits after warnings are received, they could be blocked. As for Sushant Singh Rajput, again editors adding unsourced content is not considered a vandalism act. We would place an unsourced warning message on the editor talk page. If you would find the source then add it in (this is would be the best way to do it). If the same editors continues to add unsourced content repeatedly, we could place unsourced warning level 2 and etc and also could place "disruptive" warning message after few unsourced message had already placed. A report could be make at WP:AIV but at times, a judgement call from admin, if the editor would be blocked. (Note: Admin usually dont blocked editors who placed unsourced content but only if the editor continues in many occussion (receiving many warning in many seperate occasion) then a block would be placed.) If the source state a little different from the content, then match the content as per source. Make sure the sources are reliable and independent such as from the major newspapers. Do note when reading Wikipedia articles, we always check the sources, dont trust what you read even there are sources, but read the content of the source and make sure sources are independence and reliable. To say all that, Do NOT revert unsourced or disruptive edits more than 3 time on the same page within 24hrs time frame, for you will be blocked from editing. Instead, send a personal message to the editor in their talk page or bring the discussion to the article talk page (ping the editor involved). Let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to the next assignment.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 11:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello I understood what you are saying, I will not revert or engage in edit war, and would discuss with editor to reach consensus. I'm ready to proceed to my next assignment, but I guess you haven't check all my answer (good faith and vandalism). If I'm correct or wrong please highlights the points which I should be aware of. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 11:13, 11 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Pls answer part 2 question under "Good faith and vandalism". Ping me when you have done.Thank you.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 12:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello I have answered all the questions from both the assignment. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 12:38, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

'
 * See review (key here is "intention".<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 04:45, 12 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello yes I have check the review, I understood intention really matter behind every edits and if you see deliberately edit whose motive is to harms wikipedia is vandalism. You can check my assignment 2 below. Thanks, stay safe. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:03, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * PLs see additional "italics" note above and confirm you have read it.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 11:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Warning and reporting
When you use Twinkle to warn a user, you have a number of options to choose from: you can select the kind of warning (for different offences), and the level of warning (from 1 to 4, for increasing severity). Knowing which warning to issue and what level is very important. Further information can be found at WP:WARN and WP:UWUL.


 * Please answer the following questions:
 * (1) Why do we warn users?


 * Answer: we warn users to let them know about their edit which are live as wikipedia is an encyclopedia and it's runs on reliable independent sources not on any theories/thesis. And it's necessary to aware both logged in user as well as IP editor not to WP:BITE, assume good faith and lastly follow neutral point of view. And this way we can try our bit to save wikipedia from vandal who are here to mess up things.
 * . The purpose is to "educate" the editors on constructive editing, especially those who are new to Wikipedia and to "deter" them of such actions with stronger warnings leads up to a block.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 11:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)


 * (2) When would a 4im warning be appropriate?


 * Answer: It should be used in extreme cases of continuous/disruptive editing, for assuming bad faith towards editor after getting warned for the edits. This will the last and final warning for the editor before the block.
 * ✅, 4im is only for widespread and particularly egregious vandalism such as vandalism only account and for use lower warning for less egregious vandalism.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 11:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)


 * (3) Should you substitute a template when you place it on a user talk page, and how do you do it?


 * Answer: Yes I should use substitute template whenever I post something on talk page. It can be done by adding "subst:" before the template name.
 * ✅. We should "always" subst and not just a good idea to ensure that the message on the talk page will not change even if the template is changed.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 11:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)


 * (4) What should you do if a user who has received a level 4 or 4im warning vandalises again?
 * Answer: if a user who has received a level 4 or 4im warning vandalises again, then I will report it to the WP:AIV, so that a admin can take the appropriate actions.
 * ✅.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 11:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)


 * (5) Please give examples and please do the substitution (using ) of three different warnings with three different levels (not different levels of the same warning and excluding the test edit warning levels referred to below), that you might need to use while recent changes patrolling and explain what they are used for.


 * Answer i:

Hello, I'm C1K98V. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.
 * ✅.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 11:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Answer ii:

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * ✅.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 11:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Answer iii:

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia.
 * ✅.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 11:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

-

See assignment 2 above. Stay safe and best.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 11:18, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Pls answer part 2 question under "Good faith and vandalism" Assignment 1. Ping me (in communication section Assignment 1) when you have done.Thank you.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 12:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello I have answered all the questions from both the assignment. You can now review my answers. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 12:46, 11 July 2020 (UTC)


 * See the comment above. Let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to next assignment. Also pLs see additional "italics" note on Assignment communication section and confirm you have read it.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 11:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)


 * I have gone through your comments above. Also read the italics note too. I am ready to move forward to the next assignment to learn. Thanks and stay safe. –C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 13:11, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Tools
Recent changes patrol includes a list of tools and resources for those who want to fight vandalism with a more systematic and efficient approach.

What you have been doing so far is named the old school approach. As well as manually going through Special:RecentChanges, it includes undos, "last clean version" restores, and manually warning users.

There are a large number of tool which assist users in the fight against vandalism. They range from tools which help filter and detect vandalism to tools which will revert, warn and report users.

Twinkle
Twinkle, as you know, is very useful. It provides three types of rollback functions (vandalism, normal and AGF) as well as an easy previous version restore function (for when there are a number of different editors vandalising in a row). Other functions include a full library of speedy deletion functions, and user warnings. It also has a function to propose and nominate pages for deletion, to request page protection to report users to WP:AIV, WP:UAA, WP:SPI, and other administrative noticeboards.

User creation log
In my early days of fighting vandalism on Wikipedia, one of the strategies I would use to find vandalism was to patrol the account creation log. This is located at Special:Log/newusers, and it logs every time a new user account is created on Wikipedia. You'll notice that new accounts with no contributions so far will have a red "contribs" links, whereas new accounts with some contributions will have blue "contribs" links. One great way not only to find vandalism, but welcome new users to Wikipedia is to check the blue contribs links that come in.

Rollback
See rollback, this user right introduces an easy rollback button (which with one click reverts an editor's contributions). I'll let you know when I think you're ready to apply for the rollback user right.

STiki
STiki is an application that you download to your computer, and it provides you with diffs which either it or User:ClueBot NG have scored on their possibility of being uncontructive, and you are given the option to revert it as vandalism, revert it assuming good faith, mark it as innocent, or abstain from making a judgment on the diff. In order to use STiki, you need one of the following: (1) the rollback permission, (2) at least 1000 article edits (in the article namespace, not talk/user pages), or (3) special permission via Wikipedia talk:STiki.

Huggle
Huggle is also an application you download to your computer which presents you diffs (orders them on the likelihood of being unconstructive edits and on the editor's recent history) from users not on its whitelist. It allows you to revert vandalism, warn and reports users in one click. The rollback permission is required to use Huggle.

Make sure you keep in mind that some edits that seem like vandalism can be test edits. This happens when a new user is experimenting and makes accidental unconstructive edits. Generally, these should be treated with good faith, especially if it is their first time, and warned gently. The following templates are used for test edits:, and.

I just wanted to make sure you know about Special:RecentChanges, if you use the diff link in a different window or tab you can check a number of revisions much more easily. If you enable Hovercards in the Hover section of your preferences, you can view the diff by just hovering over it. Alternately, you can press control-F or command-F and search for "tag:". some edits get tagged for possible vandalism or section blanking.


 * Find and revert some vandalism. Warn each user appropriately, using the correct kind of warning and level. Please include at least two test edits and at least two appropriate reports to AIV. For each revert and warning please fill in a line on the table below

--
 * Good day. If Twinkle does not show the template in the drop down list, then manually subst it. Pls provide hist diff for any report to AIV /RPP and etc and any hist diff which needed - see below for examples. Stay safe and best. Stay safe and best.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 13:20, 14 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Pls provide additional info for your answers as per above (example 1 and example 2) above. Thank you.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 01:46, 15 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello I'm not being able to find edit which should be reported to AIV, apart from this Ip. You should check my answer. I will try to find out revert and report to AIV if possible. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:23, 15 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Pls provide the hist diff of the revert and the page name as per your abovementioned. Secondly, take you time to find the necessary edits which fit the questions. Thank you.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 05:02, 15 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello I have updated my answer, you can now review them. I'm unable to find any vandalism edit which I should report. I know that I have time to search. Please accept my apologies. Thanks and stay safe C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 12:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC)


 * (1)  Again pls see example 1 and example 2  -  above when you provide the answer. Pls explain why you place the type of warning template and why the level of warning you placed.  (2)  In dadditon, pls provide all the link (revert/report/talk page/and etc), so kindly rework. Lastly, when you have finished all the answer, then ping for review. Thank you.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 10:16, 16 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello, I'm unable to find/revert edit which are unconstructive in nature. It's my bad luck that I'm not getting any good example while patrolling. I'm facing network issue too. I'm really working tirelessly. I need your guidance, support. Please help me. 07:22, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * First of all, you need to rework on (1) and (2) above. Hundreds of vandalism edits happen every day in Wikipedia. To find them you need to look at the recent changes edits to determine which one is considered vandalism and when there have 4 warnings message in one month, then you could report them. Pls note unsourced edits usually would not be blocked by admin, so pls report only blatantly vandalism editor. - example see here  -1, -2, -3 and . To find vandalism edits do take time so please be patient. Lastly do read WP:VAND again to familiar yourself the criteria. Thank you.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 09:41, 19 July 2020 (UTC)


 * here are another 4 examples of vandalism edits. here -4, here-5, here-6 and here-7. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 09:45, 20 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello I tried my bit once again. But still I'm unable to find/revert edit which I should report. So I apologize for that. I request you to review my answer. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:48, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * this is counter vandalism program and to find vandalism edits and report is the upmost important aspect which the participant needs to do and there is no way around by skipping or not doing it. It is not hard to find vandalism edits, I have spotted more than 100 vandalism edits today and usually if I only do vandalism work for 2 hours for any given night, I can find more than 200+ disruptive/unsourced/vandalism edits. For a biginner vandal fighter, like most of my trainees, they would find them as well just looking through the new edit log. Take your time and by the way Friday and Saturday Night (US time) have the most vandalism edits. Thank you.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 11:22, 21 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello I tried my level best to find vandalism and report. but still I'm not getting it. I'm unable to find one example of 4im cases. So I think I'm not capable enough, and you should teach somebody else, who really needs your assistance. I shall withdraw my name from the training. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 02:53, 28 July 2020 (UTC)


 * either after 4im or fourth warning, we can report the editor. It is not your are not capable enought, it is just you need to spend more time to look for it. Try it again and by the way, most vandalsim happens at night time during Friday and Saturday (U.S) time. Cheers.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 08:50, 28 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello vandalism does happen, some do it with wrong intention and some do it by mistake. I'm unable to find any vandalism edit which I should report. I would say that CVUA is not for me. So I would apologise and thanks for your efforts and teaching me. It was great to have you as my teacher. Take care, stay safe. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 10:07, 5 August 2020 (UTC)


 * OK. If you wanted to continues in the future, then pop to my talk page. Stay safe and best.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FA0"> Cassiopeia</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 10:56, 5 August 2020 (UTC)


 * , I will continue my CVUA training and want to complete it. If you would consider my request and check my answer apart from those which I couldn't find if possible. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 11:09, 5 August 2020 (UTC)