User:Cassiopeia/CVUA/Skipple

Hello, welcome to your Counter Vandalism Unit Academy page! Every person I instruct will have their own page on which I will give them support and tasks for them to complete. Please make sure you have this page added to your watchlist. Your academy page has been specifically designed according to you and what you have requested instruction in - for that reason, please be as specific as possible when under my instruction, so that I know the best ways to help you (and do not be afraid to let me know if you think something isn't working). If you have any general queries about anti-vandalism (or anything else), you are more than welcome to raise them with me at User talk:Cassiopeia/CVUA/Skipple.

Make sure you read through Vandalism as that's the knowledge which most of the questions I ask you and tasks you do will revolve around.
 * Read through Wikipedia:Vandalism, bookmarked, looks like this will need to be re-read a few times and continuously referred back to. Also read Diffs. Joseywales1961 (talk) 13:18, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

This page will be built up over your time in the Academy, with new sections being added as you complete old ones. Each section will end with a task, written in bold type - this might just ask a question, or it might require you to go and do something. You can answer a question by typing the answer below the task; if you have to do something, you will need to provide diffs to demonstrate that you have completed the task. Some sections will have more than one task, sometimes additional tasks may be added to a section as you complete them. Please always sign your responses to tasks as you would on a talk page.
 * How to use this page
 * Once you graduate I will copy this page into your userspace so you have a record of your training and a reference for the future.

 Twinkle Twinkle is a very useful tool when performing maintenance functions around Wikipedia. Please have a read through WP:TWINKLE.
 * Enable Twinkle (if haven't already) and leave a note here to let me know that you have enabled it.


 * Enabled! I have been using Twinkle for a while, primarily using the AfD features, and have used the warn / vandalism features sparingly.  Skipple  ☎  13:46, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Good faith and vandalism
When patrolling for vandalism, you may often come across edits which are unhelpful, but not vandalism - these are good faith edits. It is important to recognise the difference between a vandalism edit and a good faith edit, especially because Twinkle gives you the option of labelling edits you revert as such. Please read WP:AGF and WP:NOT VANDALISM before completing the following tasks.

Answer:
 * Please explain below the difference between a good faith edit and a vandalism edit, and how you would tell them apart.

A vandalism edit is one that is purposefully done to undermine the integrity of an article or the Wiki as a whole. Purposefully publishing incorrect, nonsense, or malicious content on an article, or other pages would constitute vandalism.

If an edit doesn't fall under one of those categories, a good faith edit should be assumed.

A good faith edit is one that is not malicious in nature. A good faith edit may be incorrect, inappropriately sourced, or may not follow WP:PG, WP:MOS, etc., but is not a direct attempt to undermine WP:PRIME.

In my opinion, I get the sense that a hint of subjectivity is involved for those edits that are borderline in nature between vandalism and good faith. In those cases, one should lean towards the good faith argument for edits.

 Skipple  ☎  13:46, 14 August 2022 (UTC)


 * ✅. For those edit we are unsure, we could check the editor history log and talk page to see their editing pattern if their edit is in question (could be good faith but dont know the Wikipedia guidelines). The key here is "intention". If an editor intends to help Wikipedia, and the edit is considered disruptive, they are still considered a "good faith" editor especially the new editor does not aware their edits are disruptive. Vandalism is a "deliberate attempt" to harm Wikipedia. Editor might edit adds incorrect or unsourced information and this does not necessarily mean a user is a vandal; the key is their "intention". Cassiopeia  talk  03:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Please find three examples of good faith but unhelpful edits, and three examples of vandalism. You don't need to revert the example you find, and I am happy for you to use previous undos in your edit history if you wish.
 * Good faith

Answer:

(1) - While this edit isn't inaccurate or malicious in anyway, it provided no value to the article.


 * ✅. Cassiopeia  talk  03:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

(2) - Good faith edit, in violation of WP:TONE and un-sourced.
 * ✅. Good. Cassiopeia  talk  03:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

(3) - I wanted to include this one because while the edit appears to be non-sense, it appears to me that it was more of a mistake rather that outright vandalism.
 * . The editor edited the page via mobile and I doubt it was a mistake even thought the edit was their first edit and also it didnt look like a test edit either. I would take it as a vandalism edit. Cassiopeia  talk  03:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Answer:
 * Vandalism

(1) - User was taking up their grievances with iRacing on the article page, maliciously editing.
 * ✅. Cassiopeia  talk  03:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

(2)  - An edit to Tulsi Gabbard which changes her allegiance flag in the infobox from United States to Russia.
 * ✅. Cassiopeia  talk  03:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

(3) - Personal feelings on the subject of an article, Charles Taze Russell, purposefully violating WP:POV
 * ✅. Cassiopeia  talk  03:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

- Good day. Good day.
 * 1) Any question regrading the assignment, please let me know here. For other questions not relating to the assignments, ping me on the talk page of this subpage   Here.
 * 2) You need to provide reasons,  hist diffs - see diffs for instructions, of the/your edit and communication/warnings messages of the involved editor talk page for your answers.
 * 3) (important) - do not revert more than 3 times within 24 hours on the same article unless the edits are absolutely considered blatant vandalisms for you will be blocked from editing. If you are not sure about the edits (whether it is a vandalism or not", pls do nothing and let other more experience/counter vandalism editors to take action.
 * 4) pls note that the motto of CUVA is "Civility – Maturity – Responsibility." Welcome to CUVA. Stay safe and best.

<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  03:03, 13 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Have you finished with the assignment since you had answered all the questions? You need to ping me when you have done so I could review it.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  00:15, 15 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Apologies ! Yes! Complete with the first assignment <span style="font-family:Gadugi;font-size:90%;border-radius:0em 1em;padding: 0.05em 0.9em;background:#3160B5;"> Skipple  ☎  00:42, 15 August 2022 (UTC)


 * : see above comments and let me know if you have any questions or you are ready for the next assignment.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>   talk  03:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Makes sense to me. Okay to move on to the next assignment. <span style="font-family:Gadugi;font-size:90%;border-radius:0em 1em;padding: 0.05em 0.9em;background:#3160B5;"> Skipple  ☎  12:24, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Warning and reporting
When you use Twinkle to warn a user, you have a number of options to choose from: you can select the kind of warning (for different offences), and the level of warning (from 1 to 4, for increasing severity). Knowing which warning to issue and what level is very important. Further information can be found at WP:WARN and WP:UWUL.


 * Please answer the following questions:
 * (1) Why do we warn users?


 * Answer: To explain why a removal of an edit has occurred. In most cases, to inform and educate the user or IP of policies, guidelines, and manual references so their mistakes or behavior doesn't continue. In cases when conduct is flagrant or inappropriate conduct continues, warning serve as a caution of repercussions if the behavior fails to stop.
 * ✅. The purpose is to "educate" the editors on constructive editing, especially those who are new to Wikipedia and to "deter" them of such actions with stronger warnings leads up to a block.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>   talk  02:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)


 * (2) When would a 4im warning be appropriate?


 * Answer: For usage as a first and only warning. Should only be used for severe, flagrant, and continuous edits when bad faith is obvious.
 * ✅.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  02:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)


 * (3) Should you substitute a template when you place it on a user talk page, and how do you do it?


 * Answer: Yes. Adding "subst:" prior to the traditional template text (ex. ) will place to value (or actual text) of the template onto the user or IP talk page, rather than call back to the template itself. If the template changes in the future, the contents of the warning on the talk page will remain the same.
 * ✅.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  02:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)


 * (4) What should you do if a user who has received a level 4 or 4im warning vandalises again?


 * Answer: Report the User or IP to Administrator Intervention against Vandalism (WP:AIV), ensuring to include information that the user is continuing to vandalize beyond the 4th or 4im warning.
 * ✅.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  02:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)


 * (5) Please give examples and please do the substitution (using ) of three different warnings with three different levels (not different levels of the same warning and excluding the test edit warning levels referred to below), that you might need to use while recent changes patrolling and explain what they are used for.


 * Answer i: } - For use when a editors removes all content from a page. Contrast against, which is to be used when an editor removes some content from an article without adequately explaining the reasoning for the removal
 * ✅.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  02:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Answer ii: - For use when an editor attempts to insert jokes or humor into an article.
 * ✅.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  02:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Answer iii:  - For use when an editor purposefully inserts promotional material into an article.


 * ✅.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  02:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

-

See assignment 2 above. For question 5 - use (example)  subs three different templates (different warning and different level of warning}} see example below.

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.

Stay safe and best.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  03:09, 23 August 2022 (UTC)


 * I've completed assignment 2! I do have an additional question regarding warnings, but I'll leave that on the Talk Page. <span style="font-family:Gadugi;font-size:90%;border-radius:0em 1em;padding: 0.05em 0.9em;background:#3160B5;"> Skipple  ☎  14:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Reviewed. Let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to next assignment.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  02:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)


 * All set to move on, . Thanks! <span style="font-family:Gadugi;font-size:90%;border-radius:0em 1em;padding: 0.05em 0.9em;background:#3160B5;"> Skipple  ☎  03:14, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

-

Tools
Recent changes patrol includes a list of tools and resources for those who want to fight vandalism with a more systematic and efficient approach.

What you have been doing so far is named the old school approach. As well as manually going through Special:RecentChanges, it includes undos, "last clean version" restores, and manually warning users.

There are a large number of tool which assist users in the fight against vandalism. They range from tools which help filter and detect vandalism to tools which will revert, warn and report users.

Twinkle
Twinkle, as you know, is very useful. It provides three types of rollback functions (vandalism, normal and AGF) as well as an easy previous version restore function (for when there are a number of different editors vandalising in a row). Other functions include a full library of speedy deletion functions, and user warnings. It also has a function to propose and nominate pages for deletion, to request page protection to report users to WP:AIV, WP:UAA, WP:SPI, and other administrative noticeboards.

User creation log
In my early days of fighting vandalism on Wikipedia, one of the strategies I would use to find vandalism was to patrol the account creation log. This is located at Special:Log/newusers, and it logs every time a new user account is created on Wikipedia. You'll notice that new accounts with no contributions so far will have a red "contribs" links, whereas new accounts with some contributions will have blue "contribs" links. One great way not only to find vandalism, but welcome new users to Wikipedia is to check the blue contribs links that come in.

Rollback
See rollback, this user right introduces an easy rollback button (which with one click reverts an editor's contributions). I'll let you know when I think you're ready to apply for the rollback user right.

Huggle
Huggle is also an application you download to your computer which presents you diffs (orders them on the likelihood of being unconstructive edits and on the editor's recent history) from users not on its whitelist. It allows you to revert vandalism, warn and reports users in one click. The rollback permission is required to use Huggle.

Make sure you keep in mind that some edits that seem like vandalism can be test edits. This happens when a new user is experimenting and makes accidental unconstructive edits. Generally, these should be treated with good faith, especially if it is their first time, and warned gently. The following templates are used for test edits:, and.

I just wanted to make sure you know about Special:RecentChanges, if you use the diff link in a different window or tab you can check a number of revisions much more easily. If you enable Hovercards in the Hover section of your preferences, you can view the diff by just hovering over it. Alternately, you can press control-F or command-F and search for "tag:". some edits get tagged for possible vandalism or section blanking

Assignment

 * Find and revert some vandalism. Warn each user appropriately, using the correct kind of warning and level. Please include at least two test edits and at least two appropriate reports to AIV. For each revert and warning please fill in a line on the table below

--
 * Good day. See assignment 3 above. If Twinkle does not show the template in the drop down list, then manually subst it. I use both Twinkle and Huggle (a better tool and a preference which is a user right tool). Pls provide hist diff (article page and editor talk page) and reasons.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>   talk  04:30, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, assignment complete! <span style="font-family:Gadugi;font-size:90%;border-radius:0em 1em;padding: 0.05em 0.9em;background:#3160B5;"> Skipple  ☎  20:25, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry about the late review. I thought I have done it and checked today and found out I havent. You do have all the questions right except the test edit. A test edit is made by new editor on their first or second (usually first) edit where by they make an edit to see "they could actually edit Wikipedia articles" - as a test. Example such as adding /removing a character, number, adding "hello/hi/test or random characters. See examples
 * test edit - 1
 * test edit - 2
 * test edit - 3
 * test edit - 4
 * Pls answer additional question 16 and 17 and let me know when you have finished. Stay safe and best.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  05:12, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, first of all, you weren't late with the review at all. I finished the assignment hours before you reviewed it, so no worries there at all. Secondly, that all makes sense. I was taking test edit to mean, an attempted edit that a user didn't appropriately review, rather than "hey, I'm seeing if I can actually change something" type of edit. That said, I have been patrolling the Recent Changes page all day and I have had some difficulty attempting to find an example. (that, or Cluebot manages to snag it before I am able to revert it) Once I find one I will be sure to update and ping you. Thanks again! <span style="font-family:Gadugi;font-size:90%;border-radius:0em 1em;padding: 0.05em 0.9em;background:#3160B5;"> Skipple  ☎  02:40, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay,, I believe the ones I found would fit that definition of editing tests. Should be complete! Assuming it looks okay to you, I am also ready to move on to the next assignment. <span style="font-family:Gadugi;font-size:90%;border-radius:0em 1em;padding: 0.05em 0.9em;background:#3160B5;"> Skipple  ☎  16:05, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * See comments above and let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to the next assignment.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  02:30, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Make sense! Thanks and ready to move on. <span style="font-family:Gadugi;font-size:90%;border-radius:0em 1em;padding: 0.05em 0.9em;background:#3160B5;"> Skipple  ☎  02:31, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * {u|Skipple}} Just a note: for the test edit #16. Even thought the IP address is belong to a public school and the editor might be edited Wikipedia for the first time, we also identify the IP user with the IP address. So, if you encounter this type of edit again (always check if the edit is the first edit or the user/IP address), we wont put test edit message on the IP user page but it would be either a vandalism or disruptive or unsourced (depend on the edit) message. Pls reply to sate you have read this, for the final exam there will be test edit questions as per above and make sure you provide new editor first edit which the edit is a test edit in nature. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  01:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

---

Shared IP tagging
There are a number of IP user talk page templates which show helpful information to IP users and those wishing to warn or block them. There is a list of these templates


 * Shared IP - For general shared IP addresses.
 * ISP - A modified version specifically for use with ISP organizations.
 * Shared IP edu - A modified version specifically for use with educational institutions.
 * Shared IP gov - A modified version specifically for use with government agencies.
 * Shared IP corp - A modified version specifically for use with businesses.
 * Shared IP address (public) - A modified version specifically for use with public terminals such as in libraries, etc.
 * Mobile IP - A modified version specifically for use with a mobile device's IP.
 * Dynamic IP - A modified version specifically for use with dynamic IPs.
 * Static IP - A modified version specifically for use with static IPs which may be used by more than one person.

Each of these templates take two parameters, one is the organisation to which the IP address is registered (which can be found out using the links at the bottom of the IP's contribution page. The other is for the host name (which is optional) and can also be found out from the links at the bottom of the IP's contribution page.

Also, given that different people use the IP address, older messages are sometimes refused so as to not confuse the current user of the IP. Generally any messages for the last one-two months are removed, collapsed, or archived. The templates available for this include:
 * OW for when the messages are deleted from the talk page.
 * Old IP warnings top and Old IP warnings bottom for collapsing the user warnings and leaving them on the talk page.
 * Warning archive notice for when the messages are archived, and that archiving follows the usually naming sequence (that is, /Archive 1).

NOTE: All of the templates in this section are not substituted (so don't use "subst:").

-


 * Hi, Posted Assignment 4 above. No exercises for this assignment but only some reading material. Once you have done reading, pls let me know so I would post Assignment 5 for you.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>   talk  02:47, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi read and understood. Are the OW tags something that is done automatically or something that we should be placing on the pages? <span style="font-family:Gadugi;font-size:90%;border-radius:0em 1em;padding: 0.05em 0.9em;background:#3160B5;"> Skipple   ☎  03:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * It is done by editor(s). For a article which is previously deleted under WP:AfD and then recreated, it is usually done by bot on the article talk page. If you have finished reading the assignment above, then ping and let me know.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  03:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, finished reading and okay to move on. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Gadugi;font-size:90%;border-radius:0em 1em;padding: 0.05em 0.9em;background:#3160B5;"> Skipple  ☎  03:41, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

-

Protection and speedy deletion
Protecting and deleting pages are two additional measures that can be used to prevent and deal with vandalism. Only an administrator can protect or delete pages; however, anyone can nominate a page for deletion or request protection. If you have Twinkle installed, you can use the Twinkle menu to request page protection or speedy deletion (the RPP or CSD options).

Protection
Please read the protection policy. Done

1. In what circumstances should a page be semi-protected?


 * Answer: When a page has had significant temporary vandalism or disruption by register and unregistered users, a temporary semi-protection should be applied. When the vandalism or disruption is long-term in nature, a indefinite semi-protection can be used.

2. In what circumstances should a page be pending changes level 1 protected?
 * Answer:
 * Answer:

3. In what circumstances should a page be fully protected?
 * Answer:

4. In what circumstances should a page be creation protected ("salted")?


 * Answer:

5. In what circumstances should a talk page be semi-protected?


 * Answer:

6. Correctly request the protection of two page (pending, semi or full); post the diff of your request (from WP:RPP) below.


 * Answer i:


 * Answer ii:

Speedy deletion
Please read WP:CSD. Done

1. In what circumstances should a page be speedy deleted, very briefly no need to go through the criteria?


 * Answer:

2. Correctly tag four pages for speedy deletion (1 promo, 1 copyvio and 2 can be for any of the criteria) and post the diff and the criteria you requested it be deleted under below. For COPYVIO pls check the text vs the source by using Earwig Copy detector


 * Answer i:


 * Answer ii:


 * Answer iii:


 * Answer iv:


 * , See Assignment 5 above and notes below.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  03:46, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * , Havent seen you work on the assingment for 3 weeks, kindly reply if you need any help.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:105%;color:#FF8000"> Cassiopeia</b>  talk  06:31, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

-- Notes

G11 (promo) - What constitute a G11? At times it is hard to define. Although if a article is blantly promote or adverstise about the subject then it is a G11. Sometimes, the it is a little subtle and that would be a judgement call. As a rule of thumb, if article about an entertainers (actor/singer/DJ/artist and etc) in dept of how hard they work, how motivated they are, using all the puffery/flowery languagues and especially the subject does not meet notability guidelines. For a corporation, we would see they list down all they product/services, their directors/key person in the company, they mission, their client, they are the influencer in their industrial, all the words/phrased to enhance/market the company and no substantial info that is supported by independent reliable sources. If you look at the this version of Zapp Scooters which you tagged G11, I have to agree with the editor who removed the tag that it is not a G11 and unsourced info can be removed.

G12 (copyvio) - 

Copyright violation addresses the use of original expression without permission of the holder which is a violation of laws even the credit is given to the source. For articles, the Copyright Law gives the copyright protection to the “original works of authorship fixed in in a tangible medium of expression” in the newspaper, magazine and freelance article at the moment of their creation, for the life of the creator plus 70 years after, and 95 years for corporation publication or 120 years from date of creation, whichever is shorter.

A “fact” is not considered an original work of authorship; but how the ways facts are recorded where the style of the writing, choice and/or arrangement of words are copyrightable. An infringement of copyright is committed when a person uses the “exact words /almost exact words in a consecutive manner” of the author/holder. To note, as a guideline, a few words copies from the original works and an idea of expression such as "weather the storm", 'crossing the Rubicon" "as dead as a doornail" and etc. proper nouns, document/event/treaty/person/title/ names are generally acceptable and so is a direct quote of speech. However, any longer phrases which would be expression in a number of ways are copyright protected. To use one of two short sentences on a large article generally is ok but it will considered infringement if the edit entry is consists of big percentage of the original work and yet for some (such as newspaper/press/journalism that takes their work very seriously - anything more than 4 exact consecutively words would considered copyvio). To avoid copyright infringement, one needs uses his/her own words to convey the source’s information. Paraphrasing could minimise the the copyright violation; however, "threshold" ultimately, court judgement would determined the if copyright violation has been made.

Copyvio for texts or images shared the same notion that it is not a copyvio if the verbatim texts or images are taken from free licence and Public domain sites/specific page/image. I have indicated to you on Assignement 3 - section 3.3 - Q5, Q6, Q7 that always check the "original source" even if in WikiCommon the editor who upload the image claim taken from a PD site, we need to check the link provided and if the site indicate the image taken from another source, then we check the source. For texts, we need to check the sites if it is a PD, sometimes the disclaimer of PD is not on the page, but on the home page or "about" page or FAQ page. Secondly, for older article (no in NPP Feed), any copyvio texts found, we will revdel it as it is almost always it is not the first versions. If a small amount of verbatim texts found in NPP Feed articles, we would revdel them; but large amount of verbatim texts we will tag G12.

Lastly, here are a few examples where the German car maker Audi was sued for copyright breach.

1. Audi infringed copyright violation over Eminem’s song “Lose Yourself” in their commercial advertising. 

2. Audi was fined US $ 965,000 over copyright infringement for using 10 words from Brian Andreas’s story of “Angel of Mercy” -

''I think I just had a wake-up call, and it was disguised as a car, and it was screaming at me not to get too comfortable and fall asleep and miss my life. (Audi commercial)'' Some people don’t know that there are angels whose only job is to make sure you don’t get too comfortable & fall asleep & miss your life.(Brian Andreas’ print)

Hope the above help. Note the above doest not substitute the Wikipedia links I provided above. Please make sure you read the reading material as well. Thanks.

-