User:CassiopeiaDream/Environmental racism in the United States/User3530 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(CassiopeiaDream and UrbanPlanningLover)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Environmental racism in the United States


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Environmental racism in the United States

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead has not been updated so far by my peers. The lead currently has an introduction that properly describes the topic of the article. The lead does not include any information that does not belong and it includes information about topics that are on the rest of the page. The lead is concise and goes straight to the point of the article.

The content of the page is all relevant to the topic of Environmental racism in the United States and helps expand upon the history of Environmental racism in America. The article is up-to-date and has many edits made over the last year to help keep the information on the page as current and correct as possible. All the topics in the page all belong in this article and almost all the paragraphs have insightful information with citations that work and are from reliable sources but a couple of the sections could have a few more details added in to help give a fuller description. This Wikipedia article does cover racism but does so in an informative and respectable manner.

The tone of the article is neutral and does not try to lean or persuade you to any one side of an argument. There is not any bias in the article as it tries to give you the information and move onto the next section. There are not any viewpoints in this page that are overrepresented but a couple of them could be explained more in greater depth.

The content of this page is all backed up by reliable sources and the content of the paragraphs are accurate in explaining the information that was received from their sources. The sources of the article are thorough and have been recently updated and reviewed to keep the content as up to date as the editors can make it. The links in the article work properly and get you to where you need to go. All the sources are written by many different authors and there are many diverse authors that explain the content in the page.

The page is very well organized and clear and it is helpful that the authors made the page easy to navigate and read the sections you want to read. Any grammatical errors in this article have been cleaned up by the many editors that help work on this article. The article is very well-organized and the page is divided neatly into many sub-sections that make it easy to head to whatever section you wish to read about on this topic.

The images on this article are very helpful in developing the topic and explaining parts when needed. Each of the images has useful descriptions that are concise and tell you exactly what you need to know with no unnecessary information on any of the descriptions. The images do adhere to the guidelines and regulations stated by Wikipedia. The images are laid out in an appealing way that does not take up more attention then they intend too, they are there to help expand the information stated in the paragraphs of the article.

My peers have not yet added any information to the page. The content is good right now as long as they continue to add work of good quality they should be in good shape to help make this a good article. This article already has a lot of good information with a few editors that are constantly improving the page, so the main thing for you to focus on is to add more detail to the information already put on the page.