User:Cassiusdog22/Woodsman/Bert Dinkles Peer Review

General info
Cassiusdog22
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Cassiusdog22/Woodsman
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Woodsman

Evaluate the drafted changes
Content

The new information, like the Jack and Jill addition, all contribute relevant facts that aid the article. The information is neutral and fact-based.

Although beefing up the “Hard hit Chopping” section could be aesthetically pleasing, the section states that it’s the same as a previous section with one exception. If you were to beef it up, make sure the information is not redundant.

Culture section could be improved in the tone and word-choice— work on making it more neutral when you edit.

Sources

All sources added are relevant to the article and add expertise is aspects that weren’t there before (axe manuals, for example).