User:Cassiusdog22/Woodsman/Deedeeedits Peer Review

General info
Cassiusdog22
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Cassiusdog22/Woodsman
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Woodsman

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

The lead in the article has not been updated yet to reflect the changes in the sandbox. But, the changes made to the lead are very good. They give a more comprehensive view to what Woodsman is and how to refer to it.

Content:

The user added a lot of new and good content to the article where it was missing. There was a lot of new content in almost every single section. The information provided a much needed clarification to many aspects of the article where information was not articulated well.

Tone and Balance:

The new content has a very neutral tone. It does not have any protruding biases and does not attempt to push opinions onto the reader. The facts are very cut and dry about the sport and the events that take place

Sources and References:

This used has a plethora of new references that they used to verify their information. All sources are cited correctly

Organization:

The organization in the sandbox is very clear and distinct and I would like to see how it translates into the original article. For instance, if the information warrants a new paragraph or if it will be put in between sentences.

Photos and Media:

This person did not add any photos