User:Cassiusdog22/Woodsman/Mpmill Peer Review

General info
Cassiusdog22
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Cassiusdog22/Woodsman
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Woodsman :

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The sandbox does not have a developed edit, but the bibliography is complete. The sources are really informational and cover a lot of ground. The sources themselves are very interactive, and feel reliable and trustworthy. The information present in the sources are neutral and only contain information that would be useful to convey what woodsman is. There are plenty of articles in the bibliography, which supports Wikipedia's preference of having 2-3 sources.