User:Cassiusdog22/Woodsman/Weirdcactus472 Peer Review

General info
Cassiusdog22
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Cassiusdog22/Woodsman
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Woodsman

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * I like how many sources you have! It really looks like you are going to make this article more well-rounded.
 * I really like that first paragraph you are planning on adding—reading the article itself I was a bit confused, and I feel like that definition would clarify things for me. I didn't really know what a "woodsman" was before reading this article, and I didn't really learn what it was from the introduction paragraph either. Your definition showed me!
 * I like all the new sections you are going to add, they all seem very relevant. You are also good at describing events in a way that is not confusing at all.
 * The "Jack and Jill" section may need some more content.
 * Overall great! If anything, I would like to see more editing on the original article as it is very flawed and could use some cleaning up.