User:Casualdejekyll/Wikipediocracy is not a bad word

"Wikipediocracy" is not a bad word.

Many editors refer to the website Wikipediocracy by an epithet, such as "a criticism forum", "offsite", or "the site which must not be named".

It is worth noting that there is nothing other than this culture preventing editors from saying the name of the website.


 * 1) It is not blocked by any edit filter.
 * 2) It is not against policy to say in a talk-page comment.
 * 3) It is actually more useful to say the name of the site, since not saying it creates a situation where only editors "in the know" understand what you're talking about.

Wikipediocracy is frequented by many editors in good standing, including many administrators. It really confuses me that editors here seem to treat it as persona non grata.