User:Casually Anonymous/Foraging/GracePhiri3750 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing

Casually Anonymous


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Casually%20Anonymous/Foraging?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Foraging

Evaluate the drafted changes
Peer review of Foragin article by GracePhiri3750

The lead section is already established in the article but a few pointers could be added to incorporate the sections you are adding to the article.

The content added to the article is relevant and well balanced. The content is also backed up by reliable sources there is a good balance of the use of journals and newsletters which makes the article a great read. The language used is clear, concise and well organized. It would be nice if you updated the table of contents since you added some subtopics to the article so the article flows better. A good use of images is needed just to bring clarity on the type of foraging behaviours being explained using specific species.

Overall the content added does improve the quality of the article as this brings a better understanding to the topic being discussed. The content can be improved adding more citations both in your sandbox and some statements in the actual article.