User:Cat241912/Ecological grief/Datotter007 Peer Review

Lead

In the lead paragraph somethings that you might be able to do is give some more insight into the impacts portion of the article, including a brief mention of the categories of people impacts that is mentioned at the end of the article. Overall the lead looks really clean and concise, you didn't over explain the ides that are in the article. The only thing I would suggest to add is that brief description of the major sections and then the sub sections in those.

Content

For the content portion, you nailed it out of the park. All the information added I felt related to the topic that was being explained. The content was up to date.

Tone and Balance

Throughout the article the sections added to the article matched the pieces. The content added was balanced, not over or under presented. In the article there was some points made that seemed like it was favoring one thing over another. But once you used context around the sentence, it showed that the favor was needed to fully explain the idea.

Sources and References

All the sources look good and are a reliable source.

Organization

Your layout of the added content is well laid out and you can see that there was intent behind it. The new content flows well with the rest article that was already there.

Images and Media

N/A

Overall

Overall the content that you have added to your article really gives a strong build to the foundation of the article that you started with. The big thing that I feel needs some work, was the lead paragraph. The lead just needs to have some more information about the layout of the rest of the article, and what is going to be talked about within it. Once that is added I firmly believe that it is a well constructed article that is based on facts from reliable sources.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)