User:Catherinepeshek/Eclogite/Zanvit Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Catherinepeshek


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Catherinepeshek/Eclogite?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Eclogite

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

There is no changes to this section, the lead section seems precise and concise. The only possible edit on my opinion is the phrase "The fresh rock can be striking in appearance" at the beginning of the second paragraph as this is an appreciative term which is subjective. Other than that seems good to me.

Content/Tone and Balance

The main changes done to the Origins of an Eclogite are great, you added a great deal of information regarding this division. I checked the links and some references and they all work great. I guess my only contribution here would be that this underlined part is good, but in my opinion could have more impact at the beginning of your article just before going into the classification. " The broad range in composition has led a longstanding debate on the origin of eclogite xenoliths as either mantle or surface derived, where the latter associated the gabbro to eclogite transition as a major driving force for subduction. "

Other than that, I believe you stated the facts properly and there are no bias or tone issues.

Sources and References

There is several citations added to the main article through this section. This is great work! I would suggest to keep the same format when referencing more than one source, for example starting from older to recent or the other way around. The first sentence on the last paragraph have inverted date [6] and [2] (1980-2004), compared to the rest of the article. Also, keep this in mind when you move the work to the final page. They have references [10] and [11] from older to recent.

Overall impressions

I believe is a great work and since you are elaborating on the origins of the Eclogite, most references will tend to be a little older, but they are all on point. I noticed also that there are few referenced lines/sentences/paragraph on the original text which could be something to check in the future.