User:Catpawhs/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Kink (sexuality)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I am interested in human sexuality and the social constructs that have an impact on women's sexuality. It is also rated stub-class with a low completedness score and over 900 views on average per day. It appears to be a topic that people are curious about and looking for information on, but the wiki page is quite underdeveloped.

Evaluate the article
The article is off to a strong start and opens with a concise and accessible definition. It provides examples with links to range of sexual fetishes and provides a wellrounded idea of the subject. It briefly mentions the link between kink and queerness, but fails to go in depth or recognize women's places in the community. The content is relevant, but desperately needs more information and better formatting/seperation of sections. The writing is very neutral and doesn't seem to present bias - it is factual and there isn't a sense of opinion in the information. All statements and facts are cited, but not all of the sources are current or relevant. For example, one of the sources is another wikipedia article, and another is a forum website. Some of the source links lead to broken websites as well. The structure is okay. The writing quality is fine and error free. There is very limited formatting, but it seems mainly due to a lack of content. There is some current conversation on the talk page, but the large majority of it is from 10+ years ago. It is mostly discourse about differing opinions in definitions of kinky jargon. Overall, the article needs some more attention and categorization. It seems that it would be beneficial to include several resources defining certain acts as it seems to be the most polarizing thing about the article.