User:Cawhite88/sandbox

Article Selection
Foraging Currency page does not exist but is referenced on the Optimal Foraging Theory article.

Realized Niche Width needs more sources to verify the validity of the information discussed. More emphasis may be placed on the behavioral ecology of both the niche width and the realized niche width resulting from the behavior of other organisms within the animal's habitat.

Limiting Factor has only a small section for ecology when it should have a separate page that goes into further detail about the topic and its ecological implications. It only uses two sources to briefly discuss the topic briefly.

Chemical Mimicry
Chemical mimicry (also referred to as Molecular mimicry) is a type of biological mimicry involving the use of chemicals to dupe an operator. In all cases of chemical mimicry it has been found that the mimicking species is the only species to benefit from the reaction with either costs or no effect on the duped species. This is by adapting to produce chemicals (ex: allomones, pheromones, odours, etc.) that will cause a desirable behavioural reaction in the species being deceived. Chemical mimicry exists within many of the different forms of mimicry such as aggressive, protective, Batesian, and Müllerian mimicry and can involve a number of different senses. Mimicking semiochemicals, which cannot be seen, make up some of the most widely used forms of chemical mimicry and is therefore less apparent than more visual forms. As a result of this, this topic has been relatively neglected in research and literature. Two examples of organisms displaying chemical mimicry include the mimicking of Noctuid pheromones by Bolas spiders in order to draw prey to the spider’s location and the duping of insects within their own nests by mimicking their odours in order to enter and hide within the nest undetected. It is important to note that in all forms of mimicry the mimicking organism is not conscious of the deceit used and does not act intentionally to trick other organisms.

Classification
Chemical mimicry exists in many forms and for a variety of uses. It may be classified by the function it performs for the mimicking species and the effect that the mimic will have on the species that is deceived. It can be used for such functions as deterring predators, drawing prey, to allow a parasite to deceive a host species, or to help assist in the reproduction of an organism.

Aggressive mimicry
Aggressive mimicry through the use of chemicals is used among a wide variety of animals. It functions to either lure the deceived organism to the deceiver or it allows for the organism to accept the presence of a parasite. The chemical mimicry used by parasites allows for the deceived organism to accept the presence of the deceiver while they benefit from either taking up food supplies or directly preying on the host species from within their nest.

Predator
Chemical mimicry of an organism’s pheromones allows predators with this ability to draw select prey to them, rather than spend their energy finding and attempting to capture these organisms with varied success. The pheromones are typically used by the prey species to attract members of their own species as potential mates. In the case of predatory chemical mimicry, the predator has evolved to emit chemicals that are structurally similar and will cause the same behavioural reactions to be displayed by the prey. However, the mimicked pheromones will draw the animal toward the predator rather than a potential mate.

One group of organisms that use this method are Bolas spiders (genus: Mastophora). Bolas spiders will emit chemicals that attract their prey, Noctuid moths. These spiders have replaced the need to spin elaborate webs to capture prey by mimicking the pheromones emitted by female moths to attract males of the species effectively. In studies conducted on this spider it has been found that the moths only approach from downwind of the spider and that all of the moths captured were, in fact, male.

Parasites
Parasitic use of chemical mimicry involves the invasion of the nest of a duped species, which may consist of an individual or a colony. By emitting mimics of the chemicals that create the host’s familiar odours the invader is able to conceal themselves efficiently within the nest without alerting the host.

One example of a group of insects that uses this method of chemical mimicry would be Cuckoo bees (genus: Nomada). Cuckoo bees will parasitize other genuses of bee, Melittidae and Andrenidae. Cuckoo bee males will produce chemicals that are similar in structure to the volatile lipids secreted by host females and these chemicals are transferred to Cuckoo females so that they may camouflage their eggs within the host’s nest. This would allow the females to pass off the care of her eggs and larvae onto the host, benefiting the parasite and burdening the host.

Protective
Protective forms of chemical mimicry work to benefit the mimicking species by preventing harm. In most cases this achieved by acting as a deterrent to other organisms by mimicking the chemicals emitted by another species that has a mechanism to deter predators. This form of mimicry is known as Batesian Mimicry.

Batesian Mimicry
In Batesian mimicry, potential prey organisms will mimic chemicals emitted by an organism that poses a greater risk to the predator in order to deter attack. Most commonly this form of chemical mimicry is seen in plant species through the release of mimicked defense chemicals. The organism being mimicked may contain noxious chemicals used to deter predators from consuming them as it will lead to the predator becoming ill. By using Batesian mimicry the operator will mimic a chemical aspect, such as “defense signals" used by plants, in order to deceive the herbivore or predator into avoiding an edible organism.

Reproductive
Chemical mimicry can also have benefits on the reproductive success of the operator. This form is used primarily by flowers in order to deceive pollinators. There are two main types, the first being pseudocopulation which involves attracting male pollinators by mimicking the pheromones of females of the species. The second type involves female plants mimicking the chemical signals of males of the same species. By doing this the female plant is able to draw more pollinators despite not producing the pollen that the animal is looking for.

Pseudocopulation
Pseudocopulation is achieved when a flower successfully mimics the appearance and the pheromones emitted by the female of an insect species. The chemicals emitted by the mimicking species work to draw these pollinators to the plant and increase the amount of visits to and time spent on the flower. This will increase the chances that pollen will efficiently stick to the organism or that pollen already stuck to it will be transferred successfully to the plant.

In one study on Mining bees (Andrena nigroaenea) and Spider orchids (Ophrys sphegodes Mill.) it was found that unpollinated Spider orchids emitted odours that consisted of hydrocarbons that were an exact match for the odours released by virginal female bees. As a result, male Mining bees are extremely attracted to the flowers of the Spider orchid, triggering more quick visits to the flower and in some cases the male bees attempt copulation, either getting themselves sufficiently covered in pollen of successfully transferring it to another plant.

ccg246's peer review
Hey, just reviewed your Sandbox draft on Chemical mimicry. You chose a huge topic, so for that, I commend you. Some suggestions for you to ponder:


 * watch your formatting: "This is[ ]by adapting to produce chemicals" (two spaces here), "research and literature. [1]." (double period), "varied success. [1]The pheromones are" (no space here in between reference and next sentence), "the moths capture were in fact male" (captured), "would be cuckoo bees" (capitalize Cuckoo), "“defense signals’" (" followed by ', needs to be the same),
 * add links to other wiki pages for the following: "Chemical mimicry exists within many of the different forms of mimicry such as aggressive, protective, Batesian, and Müllerian mimicry", "Chemical mimicry of an organism’s pheromones", and all of the examples you used
 * what senses? source?: "can involve a number of different senses"
 * "organisms that have the potential to be prey": sentence is a bit convoluted, just say "potential prey organisms", or "potential prey"
 * number 8 in your reference list is also number 3
 * no dead links in your reference list, but there are 4 error codes in there that should be fixed: "Check date values in: |date= (help)"
 * overall, your topic seemed more of a physiological response topic than a behavioural topic, so I would try to relate it back to behaviour

Ccg246 (talk) 16:19, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
Hi, I don't want to repeat much that the previous peer reviewer and TA have said, so I'll try to add on to their points:

References are put directly after the sentences' period. This is something to pay attention to, as this has been done in the article only 4 out of 22 times references are used.

For the "check date values" in sources 1 3 5 and 8, I think it's referring to the format (yyyy-mm) as the only required part of the date is (yyyy), the year of publication.

Wikipedia must also use British, not American spelling, so please change the "behavioral" and "behavior" to "behavioural" and "behaviour".

Other pages that could be linked, in case the reader is interested in exploring further, include allomones, pheromones, odours, semiochemicals, Noctuid, Bolas spiders, Mastophora, Nomada, Melittidae, Andrenidae, pseudocopulation, and Ophrys sphegodes.

As a reiteration, though, try to relate the article more to animal behaviour.

Choco Xiu (talk) 23:48, 7 November 2018 (UTC)