User:Caylee.lynn/Allantonematidae/Bstudent1 Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The article was great. The opening or lead of the article gave a general idea of what was going to be spoken about in the remaining body of the article. There was no bias and the point of view was very neutral. All of the citations were relevant and accessible. Very helpful to add the initial place where information would be added which helped clarify some context of how your addition fits into the whole piece of the section. Would potentially add more information regarding the combination of insecticides and the nematode and how they both collectively effect the tobacco plant, or clarifying why the insecticide and the nematode both have an effect on the tobacco plant, not just the nematode, or simply removing the insecticide and primarily focusing on the nematodes effect would help with the streamlining of the article. The addition of common names instead of using scientific names could also help with clarity and give a better understanding of the dynamics that the nematode plays on the other organisms.~