User:Cbk5351/Hacker/Apple1223 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Cbk5351
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Hacker

Lead

 * The lead is well thought out and provides a clear expatiation. It gives a strong but brief overview of what is going to be discussed in the article.
 * There is a table of contents that reflects each section of the article.

Lead evaluation
Overall the lead is a strong start to the article and gives the reader a good idea of what is to be discussed.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * All of the content is relevant to the article. It is hard to tell if the information is up to date because it is more of definition based article, but it has a section that is called "representation in mainstream media" which talks about current depictions in the media.
 * All of the content belongs in the article because it goes over the definition and types of hacker.
 * It does not deal with in of Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * The content is neutral since most of the article is definitions.
 * None of the viewpoints are overrepresented and it keeps a good balance information.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * The sources are current and are from credible sources.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * The content is easy to read and if free of errors.
 * It is well organized and cohesive.

Images and Media

 * No images were added to the article.

Images and media evaluation

 * I think images could be added to the article.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * The content added has provided quality to the article.

Overall evaluation
The content in the article was well done and has good sources that give it credibility.