User:Cbrennecke/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Evaluating content


 * Yes, the article gives a lot of facts and history that is relevant to the topic, nothing distracts me.


 * As far as I know, everything is up to date in the article.


 * I don't have any tips on how to improve it. It covers many different ideologies which is very important, and there are many reputable sources cited.

Evaluating tone


 * The article is very neutral and gives the views and opinions of many different positions.


 * No.

Evaluating sources


 * The links work, but there was a discrepancy between the source and the claims in the article, though it's very small. In the article it says that fourth-wave feminism began "around 2012," whereas the source states it began in 2013.
 * The references are reliable and neutral.

Checking the talk page


 * There's a conversation that began on 16 May 2018 about how the article didn't once mention transgender people, so she suggested they insert a couple paragraphs in the article. It appears the conversation ended, because the paragraphs were completed, on 23 May 2018. 3 people were apart of the conversation.
 * It has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria.
 * It hasn't so far, I've recognized things in the article from class and readings.