User:Cbright6/Energy planning/Tjpratt24 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Energy Planning Team


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Energy planning
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Energy planning

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The Energy Planning article is a very interesting article. Its concise and very to the point. The author made this article easy to read and there aren't many points of confusion throughout the article. The lead is very clear and not over detailed. The content provided is all beneficial, relevant, and up to date. Some content was very vague and I wish there was some more depth to the information. however it seems like this is a very surface level topic. It doesnt appear that there is any bias present in the article. The sources provided are mostly governmental sources so they are reliable. There is a lack of images with only 1 image displaying a Energy Planning Software. Overall, I think this article is well written. Its easy to understand, super neat and professional. I wish in some areas there was a bit more depth to the content. Other than that, I enjoyed learning about Energy Planning and reading this article.