User:Cbutron/Urban geography/Eco144 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Cbutron


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Cbutron/Urban geography


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Urban geography

Content
Through the lens of Landscape Ecology, the article draft addresses changes to urban environments. However, I feel that the article would benefit from inclusion of specific changes to urban environments. For example, in the section about biodiversity impact, it would be interesting to read about changes in native bird populations of specific cities.

Sources and References
I feel that there are paragraphs of information that are well-written but not cited. For example, in the climate impact section, there is a statistic that is not properly cited although I do see a references section.

Tone and Balance
The article's tone is neutral. It does not promote any viewpoints.

Organization
The article is divided up into approachable sections. The structure helps the reader to learn about different aspects of urban geography that flows well. The article's sections on the Impact of Urban Geography is the article's strongest sections.

However, I am unsure that "Research Topics" and "Research Interest" are good section titles. They are quite vague and difficult to understand what they mean if the reader is reading through the section titles independently.

Images and Media
Currently, there are no images or media. I feel that pictures depicting changes in urban geography over the years would enhance the article's readability.

Overall Impression
The article is well-written and is off to a solid start. I feel the article would greatly benefit from the inclusion of more content geared towards the influence of urban geography on the ecology of cities. I feel there are topics that the article is attempting to address but those sections are incomplete.