User:Ccarltonchapman/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)


 * Does the lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * I think the lead at first briefly says what CSCW is, but I don't like how it goes on a tangent on the history of it. I would rather read more about what CSCW is and how it is prevalent today as explained in the conclusion paragraph. To fix this I would simply switch the positions of the two paragraphs leaving only the definition untouched. When looking for information on a topic I immediately look for real examples of how it is used rather than the history depending on my intentions.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * There is not anything that does not belong, however there is something missing. The article talks about the past and the history of CSCW who created this and that. It also talks about today how it is very prevalent during the pandemic. What it misses is the future. I've read articles that say with technology of interfaces and systems advancing so is CSCW. I would like a section on where researchers are putting their main focus. As well as how is new research in the future going to help certain problems of CSCW be solved.
 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * It has good content for sure, but the order of information displayed is all over the place. Like i was saying earlier the first paragraph does not seem relevant compared to the paragraph of how Covid-19 affects CSCW today. I would like to see more prevalent information and problems occurred in CSCW first and the history last.


 * Is the article neutral
 * I believe the article is neutral as it does not use any point of view but rather is to the point of what CSCW is and where it originated from
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes, the sources reflect the history of CSCW and point credit to reliable people