User:Ccstacey3/Food Waste in Barcelona/Las157 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Ccstacey3, Ljr727, Abroadinbarca2023, Mpusic


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ccstacey3/Food_Waste_in_Barcelona?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

There is not a lead as it does not give a brief description of the articles main topics discusses. It just goes straight into food loss vs food waste definition and then global food waste. I know food waste in Barcelona is a section after, however a lead with a summary of what will be talk about is important. If article is about food waste in Barcelona, should have a lead that talks about that in a few sentences.

Content:

All content added to sandbox is relevant and relates to the topic of food waste in Barcelona. However, more content should be added in the "causes" section under "Food Waste in Barcelona". Adding resources and statistics about overproduction of food in restaurants in Barcelona as well as statistics in the amount of food that goes bad and therefore ends in landfills would make this section stronger.

Content under "Comparing to Other Countries" either needs a new header or more information on other countries than Spain. The content under "Outside of Spain" fits perfectly under "Within Spain" as it talks about Spain only. Suggest content under Outside of Spain should have more information about other countries and how they compare to Spain.

Tone and Balance:

Tone is great everything is neutral and does not seem biased towards a particular position.

Sources and References:

A lot of content is missing references to back it up. Under section "Food Loss Vs Food Waste" "Global Food Waste" and "Food Waste in Europe" I am assuming the article referenced is for all the content in that paragraph.

Content under "Food Waste in Barcelona" is missing references. The content is not backed up by a reliable source and therefore leaves readers confused on where information is being found from - is it accurate? The majority of information is not backed up by resources. This is especially important when mentioning statistics, studies, and data, If the same resources are used again in these sections, cite them again so readers know where information is coming from.

All resources seem to be great secondary resources with reliable information. However, the fifth one comes from a journalist so might not be the best for wikipedia therefore double check.

New Articles:

Add links to other Wikipedia articles so it is more discoverable. For example can link words such as food loss and food waste. Link any relevant words that come up and have another wikipedia pages to make your page more discoverable.Overall:

Overall great content that adds new information to Wikipedia. On the right track to a strong page, just add the necessary resources to back up information and expand on sections such as "Causes" and should be good!