User:Cdh036/Health communication/Aresiaarthurs Peer Review

General info
cdh036
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Cdh036/Health communication
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Health communication

Evaluate the drafted changes
The major edits and changes from the original article to the sandbox draft are not easy to notate. It would be helpful to include what edits and additions are being made in the lead section. To my understanding, the sandbox shows what an additional subject of social media would look like added to the health communication article? If so, I agree that social media should be acknowledged within health communication.

The overall tone of your addition is neutral however, phrases like "a dramatic increase" and " can also result in the rapid spread of misinformation" could possibly impact that neutrality. I would opt for something like "an increase in" and "may also result in the spread of misinformation." This suggestion is to avoid absolutes. Although, your content does not attempt to persuade in favor of one ideal or the other and that makes for a good Wikipedia article!

The content added is easy to read and clear. There isa clear structure and what seems to be reliable sources as well.