User:Ceannaallen/Sam Asghari/JJAtSchool Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ceannaallen


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ceannaallen/Sam Asghari - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

First thing that I notice is that the profile image is broken. And then I would condense the sources that are sourced since source #5, 6, and 7 are the same

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
Everything in the article is relevant to the topic.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
I do not see any bias in the article, by bias I mean I don't see any claims that are out there. Looks to be a basic run down of the guy.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
I do not see any overrepresent viewpoints, seems to be a general outline of the person

Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
All the links in the citations do work, a couple citations are cited multiple times, so that could be cleaned up.

Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
Possible bias since some of the sources could be fan made, but I am not an expert on celebrity sources.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
Everything seems to be current.