User:Cearly2/Consumer movement/Shenglintan Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Cearly2
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * User:Cearly2/Consumer movement

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * It is updated
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes, there is a introductory sentence including the definition.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes, the sort is very clear.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No, all the leads corresponding each part of content.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * The lead is properly sorted with classified detail.

Lead evaluation
Lead is properly written.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes it is.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes, there is upated of the content.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No, all the contents corresponding to the specific information.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * No, all the information is well-supported by the references resources with proper view.

Content evaluation
The content is clear and accurate.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes, it is all supported by the data and reliable sourses.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No, I didn't find any.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * In my opinion, it is properly presented.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, i think it is neutral to both side.

Tone and balance evaluation
Neutral and clear.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yesm it reflect properly.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Not all current, from 1941-2001
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * The sources is diverse enought and there is no marginalized people's viewpoint.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * they works.

Sources and references evaluation
The reference sources is reliable and wide.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * The content is concise and easy to read because it is well-sorted with subtitles.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * I didn't find any error.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * The sort and structure is well-organized.

Organization evaluation
The organization is clear and easy to read.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

There is no images and media added yet.


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * No.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * have not add images yet.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * have not add images yet.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * have not add images yet.

Images and media evaluation
have not add images yet.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes, the content give the read clear comprehension of each category.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * There is a charts that strongly shows the changes of the consumer movement in US.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Add some images and media to better support the content.

Overall evaluation
It is properly written and sorted and referenced.