User:Cecibudzyn/Animation/JadaClark2002 Peer Review

General info
CeciBudzyn
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Cecibudzyn/Animation - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Animation - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Very well-written and detailed and includes information that was not there at first. Added up-to-date content. Addressed underrepresented forms of Animation that aren't talked about. Has backing sources for each section edited. The content that was inputted has improved the article and the information given. I feel as though the information the editor has added, helps anyone who is researching Animation and wants to take an interest in the different kinds of animation. I think that the editor's editing is from a neutral point of view. Uses older sources which is fine because Animation has been around for a very long time, so getting information from sources that are dated, is more of a reliable source. Some other sources in their draft are updated from this year as well. Does a good job of referencing other people that are related to the topic that is being discussed. No grammatical errors. Links to sources work and are accessible.