User:Ced8213/sandbox

The Society of the Friends of the People was an organization in Great Britain that was focused on advocating for Parliamentary Reform. It was started by the Whig Party in 1792. Members wanted parliamentary representatives to reflect the population of Great Britain, which could be achieved by making voting more accessible, by allowing more men the right to vote, and by making it possible for a broader variety of men to take part in the government. The Society disbanded in the mid 1790's as a result of conservative reaction against radical political movements.

Country-party Ideology
During the 18th century, civic humanism became an important political consideration in England. Civic humanism stresses the importance of abandoning personal gain for the common good. It called for a political balance in order to prevent corruption. In England, civic humanism gave rise to the Country party, which advocated for a less corrupt government that would work for the good of the people and not for the attainment of wealth. The idea of country-party ideology and civic humanism led to the formation of many reformist movements called for parliamentary reform in order to more accurately reflect the will of the people.

Influence of the French Revolution
The end of the 18th century brought political change throughout Europe. Although the French revolution brought about extreme unrest in France, similar ideas were being discussed in Great Britain. The British radicals believed in the idea of the universal rights of man (life, liberty, and property) and democracy. Conservatives wanted to maintain the monarchy and Parliament the way it was. In 1791, Thomas Paine published Rights of Man, which stated that the French Revolution was bringing good change to the political system of France. He also declared that the people of Great Britain should rebel to establish democracy and universal rights for all men in Britain. This paper fueled the radical ideology in Great Britain at the time. It also increased the tension between radicals and conservatives, leading to political uncertainty in Britain.

Corruption in Parliament
In 1780, about 3% of the population of England had the right to elect members of Parliament's House of Commons. Additionally, some of the largest cities did not have any parliamentary representatives, but rotten boroughs still had two. The term was actually first used to describe a country or district in England that had a diminished population, but still retained representation in order for the crown to control seats in Parliament.

General Information
On April 11, 1792, a group of reformist Whigs started the Society of the Friends of the People, a group dedicated to parliamentary reform. To gain membership, a prospective member must be proposed by two current members and approved by 90% of the members. Members payed dues of two and a half guineas per year, unless they joined with the intent to start a similar organization elsewhere, in which case they payed only one. The group met on the first Saturday of each month. Notable members and supporters include Reverend Christopher Wyvill, Sir Phillip Francis, and George Tierney.

Beliefs and Publications
The Society wanted to extend the right of freedom of election to a larger group of men. They also wanted more equal representation in Congress, and they wanted to use their right in electing their representatives more frequently. In 1794, Sir Phillip Francis stated in a meeting that the society should support that any male adult who was not a convicted criminal or "lunatic" should be given the right to vote.

Address to the People of Great Britain
The Address to the People of Great Britain was written in 1792 by Reverend Christopher Wyvill. The Society feared being potentially linked to radical political movements like those in France or to radical English groups like the London Corresponding Society and the Society for Constitutional Information. As a result, this address denied any association with the political reforms happening in France. They felt that the French reformists were trying to create a new type of government, while the Society was trying to make the current English government the way it was supposed to be. They also stated that their methods were reasonable and moderate in comparison. While the French had lost hope in the government and resorted to violence as a means of bringing change, the Society was focused more on moderate reform through intellectual communication.

The Report on the State of Representation
The State of the Representation of England and Wales was delivered to the Society on February 9th, 1793. This pointed out the unfair manner in which Parliament representatives were chosen and conducted business, and it called for change of these issues. They found that members of parliament were chosen by a minuscule portion of the population, meaning they were not truly representatives for the entire people of England. The number of members were also not assigned to counties in a way that represented the population of England. They found that the right to vote was also limited to a small population, property owning men of a certain income who met religious and other requirements. The Society felt some restrictions should be lifted, allowing the voting population to be more reflective of the actual population. Similarly, they thought that the elections were held in a manner that inconvenienced many people, making it hard for some to vote. Voters often had to travel a great distance to be able to vote, which further dwindles the number of people voting. Also, although candidates theoretically only needed 300 pounds a year to qualify, the operation was set up in such a way to prevent anyone who did not own thousands of pounds from being a candidate.They also found that although Parliament was supposed to last no longer than three years, Parliament itself decided that in 1715, they could hold their seats for seven. The society felt that this duration should return to three, as laid out in the law. The Society wanted all of these grievances to spark reform in the way Parliament was elected and operated. The report was given by George Tierney, and would later be used by groups looking for evidence proving the corruption of Parliament.

William Pitt's Reign of Terror
The Revolution in France sparked fear in the leaders of other European countries. They saw reformists and radicals as having the potential to completely overturn the government and destroy the nation. As a result, William Pitt, the Prime Minister of England at the time, wanted to destroy reform in England to avoid an uprising like the French revolution. Instead of using violence to combat reform, he used legislation. He suspended the Habeas Corpus Act in 1794. In 1795, he passed the Seditious Meetings Act and the Treason Act; combined, these prevented any meetings that were "seditious and unlawful" and required that a magistrate was notified if a meeting were to occur that included 50 or more people. The Newspaper Publication Act 1798 required that all printing presses be registered in order to prevent the publication of material that criticized the government.

Spy Infiltration
The Report on Radical and Reform Societies from 1794 was a document stating that the London Corresponding Society and the Society for Constitutional Information were guilty of threatening the constitution of Great Britain through activities and publications that were consistent with radical reformist ideologies. This was discovered because of the infiltration of conservative spies in the societies, which led to the arrests of the leaders.

Disbandment
Although the Society was still advocating for Parliamentary reform in 1794 after the arrests of leaders of similar societies, they disbanded sometime after that as a result of legislation passed by William Pitt that prevented societies of this nature from meeting.

Criticism
Compared to radical groups of the time, the Society was quite moderate. In fact, they were sometimes so scared to be associated with the radical movements of the time that they rarely said anything specific at all. Instead of calling for drastic reform, they focused on listing grievances. As a result, their intentions seemed ambiguous. Francis himself stated that the Society delayed in making it clear what its intentions and feelings were about reform.