User:Celiacronin/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Guantanamo Bay Naval Base

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to evaluate this article due to the fact that it is a widely known U.S Naval base in Cuba, and has a controversial

and complicated history. There is a lot of room for error within the article due to its extensive history of conflict, and also could be written from a bias perspective considering.

Evaluate the article
Lead: Everything in the lead section is concise and sums up the main points explained within the article. Nothing seems overly detailed or out of place. There are some sections in the article that are not introduced in the lead section, so maybe needs an update. Nothing too important though.

Content: There is one random section with only one short fact that I do not believe is necessary nor is it related much to the main points historically, nor does it reflect any of the conflicts that have occurred on and about the naval base. The section for Notable people born there seems irrelevant.

Tone and Balance: I see no issues with tone and balance, all perspectives are neutral and topics are thoroughly researched and cited.

sources and citations: There are a few citations I combed through that do not seem all that reliable or may be out of date considering this is a still currently evolving political topic. May be better sources available for certain facts.

organization and writing quality: I see no obvious errors in grammer or writing quality. Sentences are unbiased and most topics are throughly researched.

images: One climate graph is shown in Celcius yet guantanamo bay uses Fahrenheit temperature scales.

Talk Page: ^ this is mentioned in the talk page. Some of the talk page is very old.