User:Celina Garcia/Conflict Face-Negotiation Theory/Malexakiss Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Sarahabrams2001, Twetz02, Catcunningham1, Kenthecreator, Laurenmyerson, Celina Garcia


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Celina%20Garcia/Conflict_Face-Negotiation_Theory?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Everything that I read from the Sandbox seemed to be coherent and relevant to the article/topic itself. There wasn't anything too distracting other than there were a few words with red underlines that usually would indicate that they're spelled wrong, however in this case I think they were flagged for no reason. The article is neutral with no bias indicated what-so-ever, it is free of claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward any position. Since the article and//or additions are not too in depth yet there is not much to be overrepresented or underrepresented so I would say it is free of those. The links to the citations work to my knowledge and the sources also seem to support the claim of the article. The few facts that have been reported in the Sandbox are well referenced by reliable sources. The sources are all from links that come from the UCF library database which is reliable and full of good sources, these sources are reliable and without bias. The information is all current and up to date, so far the only thing missing is whatever the group will add eventually as they continue with their research.