User:Celina Garcia/Conflict Face-Negotiation Theory/RamirezAlejandro305 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am reviewing Conflict Face-Negotiation Theory by Celina Garcia, Lauren Myerson, Cat Cunningham, KenTheCreator, Twetz02, and Sarah Abrams


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Conflict Face-Negotiation Theory
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

I could not find one that exists

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

The introductory sentence summarized the theory and its brief history.

The brief description elaborates more about the major sections of the theory.

The lead is concise.

Content

I was unsure about the article being up to date, as one of its sources are from 1971 and the other two are locked out, not giving me permission to view the source material.

This article does not interfere with Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance

This article does not show any biased or persuasive information, as it speaks on individuals and their nature of tactics used to save face in different situations.

Sources and references

There seems to be an issue with the sources (maybe its just on my end) as the only one that is identified is dated from 1971, which seems to be credible and aligns with the information provided in the article. Though, the other two source links provided are not functional and are locked out.

There are plenty of other sources available for this theory but alas, most of them from what I have seen require a premium to view.

Organization

The overall structure of this article seems to be well organized and legible.

It is easy to read and from what I read, there are no grammatical errors.

Images and Media

This article lacks photos or any visual media of some sort.

Overall Impressions

The article is off to a good start, the only issue that I would point out is the link of the sources. When clicked on, the link brings you to a sign in screen, where we are locked out. Perhaps find an alternative or a way around the sign in screen for all readers to view the source material.