User:Cellife/sandbox

Evaluation of Article:


 * 1) Quality Rating: Stub-Class (Does not provide a strong overview of the topic)
 * 2) Detailed lead section: The article could use improvement on the overview at the beginning of the article.
 * 3) Clear structure: The article lacks subheadings and diagrams.
 * 4) Balanced content: The article does not cover many aspects related to the topic.
 * 5) Neutral tone: The article is written in a neutral tone.
 * 6) Good sourcing: The article uses research articles for references and does cite the sources throughout the article.
 * 7) Warning banners: I did not notice any warning banners.
 * 8) Fragmented lead section: The article is short in length so it does not have fragmented lead sections.
 * 9) Value statements: The article does not use value statements.
 * 10) Gaps in sourcing: The references are named.
 * 11) Under-developed reference section: the article could use more reference and expansion overall.
 * 12) Imbalance sections: The two sections in the article are somewhat organized but they do not discuss the topic in detail.


 * In order to improve the quality of this page, I plan to add diagrams, and more relative  information relating to the topic. I will be using additional references in order to provide current and correct information on Find-me signals.


 * I am working on editing this page as a class assignment under the supervision of Dr. Joel Parker. Please do not change my edits. If you have any comments or concerns about any changes please reach out to me. Thank you!