User:Cellomont/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Dream
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * I chose to evaluate this article, because dreams can have a variety of interpretations. They are so mysterious, but there are several general facts on the topic.

Lead
Lead evaluation


 * The lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic. The lead includes a brief description of the article's major sections. I think that the Lead is concise and gets straight to the point.

Content evaluation
For the most part the content is relevant to the topic even though it does stretch pretty far out. The content is up to date. I think that there could potentially be something left out from the topic but that would require an immense amount of research on dreams.

Tone and balance evaluation
The article is neutral. I don't think that there are any claims that appear heavily biased towards a particular position. There are some points that seem to be based on the same ideas, but for the most part I don't think there is any underestimation.

Sources and references evaluation
All the facts seem to be backed up by a reliable secondary source of information. The sources reflect the available literature on the topic and they seem to be current. The links I checked seem to work.

Organization evaluation
The article is well written, it is easy to read and is concise. I did not find any grammatical or spelling errors in the article. The article is well organized, it covers ideas that fall into the main topic and covers lots of big points.

Images and media evaluation
The article includes images, but they don't really enhance understanding of the topic. The images are well-captioned, but some of the images are missing citations. The images seem to be laid out randomly.

Talk page evaluation
The conversations going on behind the scenes are strong and supportive suggestions to strengthen the article. There are various understandings on how to go about the topic and what could be the same general ideas. It is rated a level 3 vital article in society and rated as B-class. It is related to 6 wikiprojects: religion, psychology, neuroscience, skepticism, spirituality, and parapsychology.

Overall impressions

 * Overall evaluation


 * I think that for the most part everything in this article is covered with details and descriptions. If someone were doing research about dreams I think that this page would be incredibly useful to use as a starting point. It has good things to think about such as the history and underlying content. It could probably tie in more information relating to the topic. I think that the article is well-developed.