User:CelticsFan3/Protected health information/Hotpink789! Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

CelticsFan3


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User talk:CelticsFan3/Protected health information


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Protected health information

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
I noticed that you didn't change the lead section from the original article. Maybe you could add more information, so the lead section reflects the components of the article that you are adding. This was the lead section gives a more comprehensive view of your entire article. For instance, you could include an overview of the concerns with PHI.

Impression
This was a very organized article that flowed very well and was easy to understand. I liked how you used reliable sources, and provided the pros and cons of PHI. The content was neutral, which was great. The article can be improved by adding citations to all the information presented and adding information to the lead section.

Content
-There is no citation for the "HIPAA Privacy Rule" section, and that would be helpful to add.

- Grammar fix: whenever you right "US" make sure you write it as "U.S." I noticed that sometimes you left the periods out of the acronym.

- When you list the Common Forms of Cybersecurity Attacks on PHI, it would be helpful to provide a definition of everything on that list as most people will not know what they are.

- Additionally, with the Concerns with PHI section, I noticed that none of the information was cited, so make sure you add citations to all the information added.