User:CelticsFan3/Protected health information/Luckyclover44 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

CelticsFan3


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User talk:CelticsFan3/Protected health information


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Protected health information

Lead

 * Lead has not been updated to reflect changes in the article
 * Lead includes a concise and relevant introductory sentence
 * Lead does not include a brief description of the section "Concerns with PHI" or "HIPAA Privacy Rule"
 * Lead does not include information that's not in the article
 * Lead is concise and not overly detailed

Content

 * Content added is relevant to the topic (link HIPAA Privacy Rule Wikipedia article)
 * Content is up to date (mainly from late 2010s which is good!)

Tone and Balance

 * Content is neutral
 * No biased, overrepresented, or underrepresented views
 * No persuasion

Sources and References

 * One outdated source
 * "HIPAA: What? De-identification of Protected Health Information (PHI)". HIPAA Research Guide. University of Wisconsin-Madison. August 26, 2003. Retrieved June 12, 2014.

Organization

 * Article is well-organized and structured
 * No spelling or grammatical errors
 * Maybe capitalize the first letter of each word in the list under "Common Forms..."

Overall
Great job! I really enjoyed reading your article. If you could add more and elaborate on your additional sections that would enhance the article a lot.