User:CelticsFan3/Protected health information/Penguinblueberry Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

celticsfan3


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CelticsFan3/Protected_health_information?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Protected health information

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Lead needs to include the HIPPA privacy rule and the potential ethical concerns (I know it hasn't been added yet)
 * The lead is concise and efficient, those things should just be added.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * It seems to me that a lot of this content can be updated: In Particular, the Ohm article and "encouraging the use of" article. Also the Rights article and the second HIPPA article

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes - I think to make the article more neutral it could include a controversy or concerns section.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * Once the controversy section is added this will be better.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * The covered entities section needs a cite. So does business associations.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
 * Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes